AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Kim Stiles

N301 · N301N307 · NURSIN307 · NURS107 · NURS307 · N307 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Expect a polarizing, high-expectation nursing instructor and prepare for limited support if you need a warm approach.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnapproachablePseudoscience ConcernsTest HeavyPolarizingHigh Expectations
  • Recent nursing students call her rude, unapproachable, and a poor fit for science teaching.
  • Older reviews praise her as , and inspiring.
  • Would-take-again is 0% among those who answered, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

and high expectations mean an A takes real effort, not .

All evidence is from In person nursing reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Nursing content with tests, group work, and high standards makes the material demanding.

All evidence is from In person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

At least ; flexibility is limited in program courses.

In person only; and mixed other notes.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

and teaching-style complaints.

In person only; older praise does not outweigh recent avoidance.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Graded by few things and .

Format shift

In person reviews only.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Tests, group projects, and clear but .

Format shift

In person reviews only.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Sharp split between caring expert and rude, unapproachable instructor; recent tone is negative.

Format shift

In person only; newer reviews drive the lower score.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Test heavy tags and .

Format shift

In person reviews only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

newer ones slam her as rude and unscientific, while older ones call her amazing and kind.

Main concern

Unapproachable tone and .

What students said

“Terrible. Teaches mysticism instead of science.”
N301
“Rude and cruel is all I can say”
N301N307
“Kim was an .”
N301N307

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews stress tests and few graded components but .

Test heavyFew graded itemsGroup projects

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students note ; exact exam security is not clearly described.

Test heavyGraded by few things
“ ”
N301

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Rude and cruel is all I can say”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 In person reviews, highlighting polarization between older praise and recent harsh criticism. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Unapproachable Presence

30/100

“Unapproachable to the likely result in sarcasm”

🧪 Content Controversy

35/100

“Teaches mysticism instead of science.”

⭐ Older Praise

80/100

“Kim was an .”

🚫 Low Recommendation

32/100

“You have no choice but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Teaches mysticism instead of science
  • She went beyond teaching the topics simply by the book
  • She is a burnt out instructor

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Rude and cruel is all I can say
  • very kind and understanding instructor
  • she always has to be right, its her way or no way

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Test heavy
  • She has high expectations if her students
  • Graded by few things

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Eight In person reviews with a long time span but polarized opinions and sparse grade detail.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

N301N3073 reviews
N3011 review
N3071 review
NURS1071 review
NURS3071 review
Show 1 more courses
NURSIN3071 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values