AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Mousa Rebouh

MATH101 · 101A · TRIG181 · MATH101B · MATH181 · MATH201 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you can learn math almost entirely on your own and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesMust self-teachUnclear gradingHard mathRare take-home exam praise
  • and force self-teaching in trig and algebra-level courses
  • and little help on exercises are recurring complaints
  • and dropped low tests

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

High difficulty and and uncertain.

Almost all evidence is in person; the single .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Students rate content and delivery as very hard, especially trig, with little lecture support.

In-person math courses dominate the difficulty complaints; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews split between mandatory and .

Mixed in-person reports; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and warn others away despite one glowing outlier.

Negative consensus is strongest in person; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

Students repeatedly and exams feel punitive.

Format shift

and ; most others disagree.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

; still stressful for many.

Format shift

In-person focus on lectures and tests; limited online workload detail.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Dominant theme is confusing, ineffective lectures that leave students teaching themselves.

Format shift

Five of six reviews are highly negative; one MATH201 in-person review is strongly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Comments , and occasional take-home exams rather than projects.

Format shift

and take-home options; online review does not detail assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and ; one MATH201 outlier loved take-home exams.

Main concern

Students feel they must teach themselves and get little useful help.

What students said

“trying to TRIGONOMETRY!!!”
MATH181
“Worst math teacher ever! He doesn't have a ”
101A
“I love this teacher because he lets you have a ”
MATH201

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online review says lectures fail and the student self-studied.

Main concern

.

What students said

“I self studied. His lectures are blunders”
MATH101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

One student reports friendly take-home exams and dropped lows; and harsh.

Take-home exam (outlier)Unclear grading criteriaDrops lower test scores (outlier)

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

one MATH201 student got take-home exams and dropped lows; and .

Take-home examDrops lower score testsUnclear grading criteria
“he lets you have a who does that. Besides he drops the .”
MATH201
“ ”
TRIG181

Online

and self-study.

“I self studied. His lectures are blunders”
MATH101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Most people go to school because teaching themselves isn't exactly an option... trying to TRIGONOMETRY!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (1 online, 5 in person), highlighting teaching failure and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Horrible teacher. .”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“ ”

🧠 Self-Teaching Burden

20/100

“I self studied. His lectures are blunders”

📝

70/100

“he lets you have a ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures accomplish nothing
  • His lectures are blunders

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Help

  • TRIGONOMETRY
  • little to no help when completing exercises

Theme 3

⚖️

  • doesn't have a

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Only 6 reviews with consistent negative tone overall, but one strong positive outlier and limited grade data lower confidence.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

101A1 review
MATH1011 review
MATH101B1 review
MATH1811 review
MATH2011 review
Show 1 more courses
TRIG1811 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1