AI Rate Professor

History

Megan Gudgeirsson

HIST105 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want passionate history lectures and , and keep up with reading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAmazing lecturesStorytelling styleGet ready to readExtra credit oftenFriendly and helpful
  • Story-style lectures students love listening to
  • and
  • is frequent and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

and listening carefully help a lot, but , and writing still require steady work for an A.

Evidence comes only from in-person HIST105 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is approachable through storytelling lectures but paced with and writing expectations.

Evidence comes only from in-person HIST105 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and success tracks with being present and awake in lecture.

Evidence comes only from in-person HIST105 reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Both students rated her a 5 and .

Evidence comes only from in-person HIST105 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

while both note frequent that can lift grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

, and get-ready-to-read expectations make the load substantial.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students praise story-like lectures, passion, accessibility, and readiness to help.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Grade mix of lecture listening, weekly quizzes, reading-based writing, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person HIST105 with storytelling lectures, mandatory , and regular .

Main concern

Fast talking and and grades if you zone out.

What students said

“ as if telling a story. I love listening to her lecture but she can talk very fast”
HIST105
“ and a lot of writing based on lectures and reading. Regular .”
HIST105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on weekly quizzes and writing tied to lectures and .

Weekly quizzesLecture-based writingExtra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work includes weekly quizzes and .

Weekly quizzesLecture-based writingExtra credit
“ and a lot of writing based on lectures and reading.”
HIST105
“As long as you are awake and listening to her speak, you can get an A.”
HIST105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ as if telling a story. I love listening to her lecture but she can talk very fast, so be prepared when taking notes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“Dr. Gudgeirsson is clearly passionate about her field. She gives long detailed lectures and tries to be very accommodating to the students.”

👍 Recommendation

92/100

“Really friendly and ready to help when needed. is given often.”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“ and a lot of writing based on lectures and reading.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • as if telling a story
  • Amazing lectures
  • gives long detailed lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Get ready to read
  • As long as you are awake and listening to her speak, you can get an A
  • Regular

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Really friendly and ready to help when needed
  • ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS
  • tries to be very accommodating to the students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only two detailed 2018 in-person reviews, both highly positive and consistent, but sample size is small and dated.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST1052 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values