AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Chih-Huei Wang

MATH101C · 101B · MATH101B · MATH181 · 101C · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Only take if and keep up with ; teaching quality is highly mixed.

Best fit · Self Taught ProLots of homeworkMixed teaching clarityNice but unevenTest heavyFlexible grading sometimes
  • and harsh teaching critiques
  • Lots of ; some say HW gets no credit
  • Pace can feel rushed and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

and basic tests, but and mixed instruction still require real effort for solid grades.

Online review is more positive; A feels.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Multiple students call the class not easy, fast-paced, and concept-heavy with .

In-person reviews emphasize pace and difficulty more than the single online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and stress not missing sections or participation.

; online attendance is unclear.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

and half would not, matching a sharp split in teaching praise versus criticism.

Online evidence is positive; in-person recommendation is divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

; others tag tough grader or no credit on lots of homework.

Format shift

In-person views conflict; online notes support.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of homework appears repeatedly, .

Format shift

Heavy workload shows mainly in in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Students agree she is nice and caring, but and lectures mirror the textbook.

Format shift

Online praise is strong; several in-person reviews are sharply negative on teaching clarity.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and tests/practice exams matter, with participation also emphasized.

Format shift

and test-heavy load; online focuses on homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person experiences range from supportive and flexible grading to poor organization, rushed coverage, and .

Main concern

Many students say lectures add little beyond the textbook and .

What students said

“Pro Wang is a nice lady, but not a good teacher.”
MATH101B
“ , and her tests are all about the basic stuff.”
101B
“I learned more from just reading the book than I did in her actual class.”
MATH181

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online MATH101C review is strongly positive about encouragement, feedback, and , while .

Main concern

Single review limits confidence and .

What students said

“Very nice professor, encouraging and supporting student a lot, bringing math knowledge and skills from outside textbook.”
MATH101C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as basic with practice exams provided, but - and homework-heavy.

Practice examsTests on basic stuffTest heavyHomework heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students mention practice exams before tests, basic test content, and a .

Practice examsBasic testsTest heavyLots of homework
“she did provide practice exams before every test. However, her grading is really flexible, and .”
101B
“TEST HEAVY”
MATH181

Online

Online review ; it stresses homework, questions, and not missing class.

Homework requiredExtra credit
“Make sure that and dont miss class.”
MATH101C

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Pro Wang is a nice lady, but not a good teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (1 online, 5 in person), highlighting polarized teaching quality and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Mixed Teaching

48/100

“ and I learned more from just reading the book than I did in her actual class.”

📚

28/100

“Also, she gives lots of HW but does NOT give credit.”

⚖️

55/100

“ , and her tests are all about the basic stuff.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • not a good teacher
  • Sometimes
  • bringing the math knowledge and skills from outside textbook

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • her class is not easy
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Very nice professor
  • Encouraging and supporting student
  • She does care about students succeeding

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews from 2017-2018 across online and , but opinions are polarized and some positive reviews have many thumbs down.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH101C2 reviews
101B1 review
101C1 review
MATH101B1 review
MATH1811 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values