AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Shrenki Shah

ENGI115 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless and Solidworks and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesUninterested DeliveryLecture HeavyTough On ProjectsMandatory Attendance
  • Students find lectures confusing and unengaging for CAD and Solidworks.
  • and skipping risks failing.
  • and one F plus tough project expectations.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

One student earned an A with , but and few graded items.

All evidence is from in-person ENGI115 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

CAD and Solidworks require real interest and because lectures feel .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Both students because .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

, while another tags him as a .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Projects and and students say you must put in extra effort.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Students , and even if he is personally nice.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Projects and learning.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ENGI115 feels confusing and low-energy, with and .

Main concern

Weak lecture clarity plus high project expectations can sink grades even if the .

What students said

“Tbh .”
ENGI115
“This guy cannot teach. He's a nice professor and all but .”
ENGI115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects and .

Project FocusedLab Assignments Matter

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lab performance rather than a .

Project FocusedLab Assignments Matter
“He expects a lot out of your projects and such and .”
ENGI115

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This guy cannot teach. He's a nice professor and all but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting weak lecture clarity and . Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Clarity

28/100

“Tbh .”

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“This guy cannot teach. He's a nice professor and all but .”

📚 Workload Reality

35/100

“He expects a lot out of your projects and such and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Tbh .
  • I'd say that he needs to pursue more and sound like he is interested rather than dead.
  • This guy cannot teach.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Apart from .
  • He expects a lot out of your projects and such and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two 2018 in-person reviews with mixed grade outcomes and limited detail reduce confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGI1152 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values