AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Steven Bolt

CNET173 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Skip if you need reliable post-term grade support, since the only review flags serious follow-up issues.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDecent LecturerGrade Error HassleHard to Reach After TermClear Criteria TaggedWould Not Retake
  • Only one review rates him a decent lecturer.
  • A grade error after the course forced escalation to the dean.
  • Student would not take him again due to post-course unavailability.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

There is required dean involvement.

All evidence is from the single in-person-labeled review.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty is moderate and comments focus more on support issues than content hardness.

All evidence is from the single in-person-labeled review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

The as not mandatory.

All evidence is from the single in-person-labeled review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

The only student would not take him again after post-course grade problems.

All evidence is from the single in-person-labeled review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

, but a grade error still needed dean escalation.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person-labeled review.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

No strong workload details appear beyond standard course expectations.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person-labeled review.

Teaching experience

Average

40/100

Called a decent lecturer, yet availability and follow-through after the term were poor.

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person-labeled review.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly show whether .

Format shift

All evidence is from the single in-person-labeled review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person-labeled review describes a decent lecture experience but .

Main concern

Post-course unavailability when a grade needs fixing.

What students said

“A decent lecturer considering this was an online course. However, he had too much going on that he was not available after the course ended to correct a grade error.”
CNET173

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

review.

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The or proctoring rules.

“A decent lecturer considering this was an online course. However, he had too much going on that he was not available after the course ended to correct a grade error.”
CNET173

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A decent lecturer considering this was an online course. However, he had too much going on that he was not available after the course ended to correct a grade error. I had to engage the dean.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person-labeled review, highlighting lecture adequacy and post-term support failure. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Follow-Through Risk

30/100

“he was not available after the course ended to correct a grade error. I had to engage the dean.”

🗣️ Lecture Quality

40/100

“A decent lecturer considering this was an online course.”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“No”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • A decent lecturer considering this was an online course.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Support and Grades

  • he was not available after the course ended to correct a grade error.
  • I had to engage the dean.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

A single 2018 review with limited course detail is too thin for high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CNET1731 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values