AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Jo Rodgers

ANTHR101 · ANTHRO001 · ANTH101 · ANTH · ANTH102ONLINE · ANTH10401 · ANTH103 · ANTHROPOLOGY · ANTHRO101 · ANTH102 · ANTH104 · ANTHR102 · ANTHARCH · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Prefer her in person if possible; online works only if you can keep up with and strict originality rules.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra-credit heavyDiscussion strict onlineTangent-prone lecturesClear grading criteriaDeadline serious
  • as interesting and manageable with study guides and labs.
  • Online sections draw and multi-day posting rules.
  • Effort and following her detailed criteria usually earn solid grades, especially with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic with steady work, discussions, and , but and deadlines demand real effort.

In person feels easier with labs and study guides; online is .

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

Material is approachable for many, yet reading load and .

Online is described as more demanding and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

; others online have no physical attendance but rigid login patterns.

In person may use random roll and lab credit; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

and clarity; the other half warn about harsh online grading and workload.

In-person recommendations run warmer; online reviews are more mixed to negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

and , but online discussions are graded very strictly for originality.

Format shift

In person often feels fairer; .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Weekly quizzes, discussions, papers, and reading keep the pace steady; summer or online terms feel heavier.

Format shift

Online multi-day posts and .

Teaching experience

Good

64/100

Passionate and , though tangents and uneven online support lower the average.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is stronger; online support and structure draw more criticism.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Mix of quizzes, midterms, discussions, labs, and a term paper depending on the course.

Format shift

Online leans toward discussions and open-book quizzes; in person adds labs and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews often call her passionate and , and balancing occasional tangents.

Main concern

Lectures can wander off topic, and if you are not consistent.

What students said

“She is an as long as you follow her instructions!”
ANTH101
“she randomly takes roll. Read the book. She gives outlines for test.”
ANTH101
“if u read the book and show up to class u will get an A”
ANTH102

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report , and very strict plagiarism or full-credit standards.

Main concern

and multi-day posting requirements frustrate many online learners.

What students said

“She's an and considers practically anything to be plagiarism.”
ANTH102ONLINE
“two discussions and ”
ANTH102ONLINE
“She NEVER GIVES ”
ANTH104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

multiple attempts, though midterms can still be challenging.

Open book quizzesStudy guidesMultiple quiz attempts

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

outlines; labs and pop quizzes also count.

Study guidesLabsPop quizzes
“She gives outlines for test.”
ANTH101
“ as she gives a study guide before hand.”
ANTH101

Online

Online students report open-book weekly quizzes, timed midterms, and .

Open book quizzesTimed midtermsStrict discussion grading
“two discussions and , and two midterms and ”
ANTH102ONLINE
“ can be earned”
ANTH102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you put in the effort, you will get an A, and will probably learn more about anthropology.”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews (8 online, 35 in person), contrasting format-specific workload and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

64/100

“She was a great professor and really got me into the subject”

💻 Online Strictness

35/100

“She's an and considers practically anything to be plagiarism.”

🎁 Lifeline

75/100

“she automatically gives everyone 100 points of .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • but still an excellent professor
  • Passionate about the subject
  • Her and easy to understand

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you follow it closely, you should do well
  • You EARN your grade, it's not given
  • Do the reading and log in for about 15 minutes a day and you have an easy A

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • her online class structure is too demanding
  • requiring you to post on 3 different topics, 3 times on 3 different days
  • Getting information from your textbook... is still considered as plagiarism

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

43 reviews across many years with evidence.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 59
3 out of 57
2 out of 57
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ANTH10112 reviews
ANTH10210 reviews
ANTH102ONLINE7 reviews
ANTH1043 reviews
ANTH2 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ANTHR1022 reviews
ANTH1031 review
ANTH104011 review
ANTHARCH1 review
ANTHR1011 review
ANTHRO0011 review
ANTHRO1011 review
ANTHROPOLOGY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values