AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Mark Brautigam

CS102 · COMPSCI102 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

grades may be fine, but learning outcomes are highly uncertain with only two conflicting reviews.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSplit ReviewsClear Grading PraiseFair Or IneffectiveSTEM ProgrammingA Without Mastery Risk
  • Only two reviews exist and they completely contradict each other on teaching quality.
  • Both students report an A, but one says the class left them unprepared for the next CS course.
  • One review calls him the fairest STEM professor; the other calls him the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Both reviewers earned an A, including the student who says they learned almost nothing.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

One student found it challenging but rewarding, while the other focused on shallow coverage rather than pure content hardness.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

; the other does not discuss flexibility clearly.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

and praises lectures; the other warns not to waste time if you want to learn programming.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

and both recorded grades are A, suggesting accessible outcomes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews give little workload detail beyond a moderately challenging STEM course feel.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching quality is and a claim of learning nothing usable.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments do not and outcome quality.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Two in-person CS102 reviews clash hard: one praises fair clear lectures, the other says students pass without real programming foundations.

Main concern

Possible A without enough depth for the next programming course.

What students said

“Professor Brautigam is by far the most fair professor I've had in any stem class.”
COMPSCI102
“I passed w/ an "A" & still knew nothing!”
CS102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring details.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I passed w/ an "A" & still knew nothing!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting in-person reviews, highlighting fairness praise versus shallow learning claims. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️ Fairness Praise

72/100

“Professor Brautigam is by far the most fair professor I've had in any stem class.”

🧩 Learning Gap Risk

30/100

“If u want to learn programming, DON'T waste ur time w/this guy.”

🎯 Lecture Clarity Split

50/100

“He is excellent at getting to the point.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • He is excellent at getting to the point.
  • The .

Theme 2

📈 About Grades & Learning

  • I passed w/ an "A" & still knew nothing!
  • His class was challenging to some degree but self rewarding nonetheless.
  • We didn't cover ANY of the details needed for that class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews exist, they conflict sharply, and , so confidence is low.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COMPSCI1021 review
CS1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values