AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Thuy-Lan Rouland

STATS159 · MATH188 · MATH167 · MATH159 · MAT188 · MATH153 · MATH190 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless and can handle hard math tests with weak lectures.

Best fit · Self Taught ProReads from the bookHard tests vs homeworkPoor lecture clarityThick accentSelf-study required
  • Most students say lectures are long, boring, and .
  • useful practice or study guides.
  • A minority find her nice or fair if , but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Many say tests are much harder than homework and and attendance.

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Average difficulty is high and students call lectures confusing with .

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and warn missing class hurts your chance to pass.

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

Majority language , and pointless lectures.

All evidence comes from In person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Several students call grading arbitrary or harsh; .

Format shift

Based only on In person evidence.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

and needed group or self study.

Format shift

Based only on In person evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Dominant theme is reading the book, low interaction, thick accent, and little real teaching help.

Format shift

Based only on In person evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Few quizzes in some sections; .

Format shift

Based only on In person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math and stats students largely report unclear lectures, book-based teaching, hard mismatched tests, and a .

Main concern

You may learn little in class and .

What students said

“Do yourself a favor and .”
MATH159
“You're on your own. Run the other way”
153
“Lectures are essentially pointless. Long and ”
MATH188

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are frequently described as very hard and .

Hard testsTests unlike homeworkFew quizzes in some courses

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report , and limited study guides.

Tests unlike homeworkChallenging examsNo practice tests
“ ”
STATS159
“the ”
MATH188

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 in-person reviews with High credibility due to large consistent sample.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Lectures are essentially pointless. Long and ”

👎 Recommendation Rate

16/100

“You're on your own. Run the other way”

📚

25/100

“If you like to learn on your own, then she's great.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she just reads out of the book
  • talks to the floor for the most part
  • No interaction whatsoever

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • the
  • never give you a good grade although you work very hard

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • class is three hours long, and she does not give us a break until the last 30 minutes
  • hard to understand accent
  • poor teaching skills

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-three in-person reviews spanning many years with consistent negative teaching themes and some minority dissent.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 53
1 out of 513

Course coverage

MATH15910 reviews
1532 reviews
MATH1882 reviews
MATH1902 reviews
STATS1592 reviews
Show 5 more courses
0604771 review
1591 review
MAT1881 review
MATH1531 review
MATH1671 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1