AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kelvin Jew

MATH19101 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Skip unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh test gradingInconsistent policiesSelf-taught requiredPolarizing easeWeak communication
  • Two of three reviews strongly warn against him for and poor help.
  • One outlier calls him the easiest professor with heavy and book-based tests.
  • communication gaps and rigid exact-method scoring dominate.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

One review claims via , but most describe zero partial credit and rigid exact-method scoring that kills grades.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students report high difficulty when self-teaching is required and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

; others do not stress attendance rules.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Two detailed reviews urge students to stay away, outweighing one glowing easy-A outlier.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students say minor mistakes zero whole problems and he will not compromise on scoring.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload centers on a .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Most students call him boring, slow, and weak at explaining mistakes or helping when asked.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Comments emphasize tests as the only grade, with little weight on other work.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

most describe poor communication, harsh partial credit, and , while one older review praises easy tests and heavy .

Main concern

Minor mistakes wipe full problems and policies feel inconsistent.

What students said

“ .”
MATH19101
“If you can teach your self math, then this is for you, if not then stay far away.”
153
“Easiest professor ever! Three tests, 30% , test questions are all from books!”
151153

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and are described as unforgiving on method and calculator use.

No calculatorsExact method requiredTest-only gradeBook-based tests claimed by one student

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

method, and can zero a whole problem for minor errors.

No calculatorsExact method requiredTest-only grade
“He does not let you use calculators for tests.”
153
“one or two minor mistakes and you get the whole problem wrong.”
MATH19101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting polar teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Teaching Quality

32/100

“Horrible teacher. grade.”

📉 Recommendation

28/100

“ .”

📝

22/100

“one or two minor mistakes and you get the whole problem wrong.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lacks communication skills when students ask for help
  • He is super boring and makes you solve the problem EXACTLY the way he shows you
  • And

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easiest professor ever! Three tests, 30%
  • grade
  • doesn't compromise with students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three old reviews from 2014-2015 with sharp polarity and limited grade detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

1511531 review
1531 review
MATH191011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1