AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Christopher Smith

CHEM109 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid if ; reviews consistently describe an unhelpful, frustrating classroom.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnprepared LecturesUnhelpful on QuestionsSelf-Taught ExpectationIrritable in ClassAvoid for Chem
  • and expectation that students teach themselves from the book.
  • Students report rudeness or irritation when asking questions during lecture.
  • Quizzes and yet taught, with little study guidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

24/100

Self-teaching chemistry plus unclear tests makes strong grades hard without prior strength in the subject.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Course content is hard because and pace feels too fast.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews , so flexibility cannot be confirmed.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Every review advises against him due to poor teaching and a negative classroom climate.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Grading details are sparse, but , and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students must read the full textbook and self-study because lectures provide little support.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Repeated reports of , and irritation at student questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Quizzes and yet taught.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person CHEM109 experience is consistently poor: fast or unprepared lectures, little guidance, and irritated responses to questions.

Main concern

You are expected to learn mostly from the textbook with minimal useful lecture support.

What students said

“He expects students to learn on their .”
CHEM109
“ . especially on what you should study for in preparation for a test”
CHEM109
“expect students to learn by themselves. Lecture was too fast and not helpful.”
CHEM109

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests and exam risk without proven proctoring details.

Unclear Test PrepQuizzes on Untaught MaterialTextbook Self-Study

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests are described as unclear in scope, sometimes covering material not taught yet.

Quizzes on Untaught MaterialUnclear Study Guidance
“ yet taught.”
CHEM109
“ . especially on what you should study for in preparation for a test”
CHEM109

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and does not offer guidance to the students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person CHEM109 reviews with highly consistent negative themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Professor Smith may be a nice guy but he is not a good teacher at all.”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“overall highly not recommended for anyone who wants to learn in a positive environment.”

📖

30/100

“expect students to learn by themselves. Lecture was too fast and not helpful.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is unprepared for lecture
  • Lecture was too fast and not helpful.

Theme 2

😠 About Classroom Climate

  • becomes rude and berating when you ask him questions
  • very often irritated when you try to ask him a question during lecture
  • constantly got irritated.

Theme 3

📈 About Tests

  • yet taught
  • . especially on what you should study for in preparation for a test

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 consistent in-person reviews; tone is uniform but sample size and age limit confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHEM1094 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1