AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Danijela Babic

CNET158 · CNET155 · CNET155AANDB · CNET156A · CNET155A · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if ; expect mixed teaching quality.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTextbook HeavyMemorization FocusedMixed ReviewsHelpful When AvailableLecture from Slides
  • Many students say lectures are textbook-driven and boring
  • time
  • A minority praise her help, availability, and networking content

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some say hard work and , but tests reward memorization under time pressure.

Online review mentions an A+; in-person reviews stress memorization and mixed effort rewards.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Average difficulty is moderate, with content that is book-based rather than conceptually deep.

Online review rates difficulty 2; in-person difficulty comments range from easy memorization to chore-like.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

40/100

One supportive review says being there every class helps grades, but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

and strong criticism of boring textbook lectures.

The lone online review is highly positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

text rather than harsh curve talk.

Format shift

Online student earned A+; .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Projects and labs appear, but many call projects bogus or low value with textbook-centered work.

Format shift

Workload detail .

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

some find her helpful and improving, many say she reads slides and lacks practical depth.

Format shift

Online feedback is excellent; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Multiple reviews say tests and and multiple-choice memorization.

Format shift

; online review does not detail assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person networking classes often feel mechanical, textbook-scripted, and boring, though some students find her helpful and improving.

Main concern

, and limited practical depth.

What students said

“This instructor speaks funny and and errors.”
CNET158
“Difficult to stay awake during lectures & the entire course too "mechanical".”
CNET156A
“Danijela helped me get back on track with this class. and knows what she is talking about”
CNET155A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online review is strongly , and available.

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so the strong praise may not generalize.

What students said

“Danijela is fantastic! I am not sure what the other's problems were but and and answer questions.”
CNET155AANDB

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

time, with little evidence of open-book formats.

Textbook word-for-word testsMultiple-choiceTight test timeMemorization heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe textbook-sourced multiple-choice tests with little time for Q&A and memorization pressure.

Textbook word-for-word testsMultiple-choiceTight test time
“The and word for word from the text. No time to read Q&A during test so you either memorized the answers or cheat-sheet!”
CNET158
“Not enough time for tests. Copy or and -word, line-for-line out of the book.”
CNET158

Online

Online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Difficult to stay awake during lectures & the entire course too "mechanical".”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews (1 online, 12 in-person), highlighting mixed teaching quality and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“This instructor speaks funny and and errors.”

👍 Recommendation Split

42/100

“ technology.”

📘 Textbook Dependence

40/100

“The presentations were straight from the textbook.”

💬 Helpfulness

70/100

“ and and answer questions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and errors
  • the entire course too "mechanical"
  • which is nice

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you work hard and be there for every class, you will get a great grade
  • memorized the answers or cheat-sheet
  • If you memorize well without much thinking, you will do well on the tests

Theme 3

📚 About Course Content

  • Lectures & course did not feel practical or "real world"

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across several years give decent coverage, but most are old and opinions are mixed.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CNET1586 reviews
CNET155A3 reviews
CNET156A2 reviews
CNET1551 review
CNET155AANDB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values