AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Amrital Kaur

PRECA188 · MATH0502 · MATH188 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you will keep up with and can self-check the book when lectures feel thin.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing math teacherLots of homeworkCompleteness-based HW checksExtra study sessionsFast lecture pace for some
  • many praise clear examples and .
  • ; completeness often matters more than perfect accuracy.
  • Pace and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

Completeness grading and help can support good grades, but harsh outliers and .

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Many say she makes precalc easier to follow, while others find the pace and analogies .

Content difficulty comments are all in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, though class presence and study sessions appear useful.

; all reviews are in-person.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Half the voices strongly recommend her help and clarity; .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Homework completeness is lenient, but and .

Format shift

Grading reports are mixed and all in-person.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Multiple students flag a lot of as ridiculous amounts.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and willingness to help; others say she just copies the board or moves too fast.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

40/100

and quizzes; homework completeness is a notable grade lever.

Format shift

Assessment pattern described in in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person precalc/math students either love her clarity and help or warn , and .

Main concern

and a few students report grading that feels personal or inconsistent.

What students said

“ but she only will check the completsness not the Accuracy Rate”
MATH188
“She teaches at the speed of lightning and expects the students to keep up”
MATH188
“she still gave me a C. She has no real way of grading”
MATH188

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, though she sometimes removes unfinished questions.

Timed testsQuizzesHomework completeness checksQuestions sometimes cut if unfinished

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; homework is checked mainly for completion.

Timed testsCompletion-based homeworkOccasional question cuts
“ time,but she will cut some of the question if we didn't finish it.”
MATH188
“ but she only will check the completsness not the Accuracy Rate”
MATH188

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She make math much easier to follow. ,and willing to help you with any of your question.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person math reviews with strong positive and negative clusters; credibility High.

🎯 Help and Clarity

58/100

“ and every example of Precal very clearly.”

📚

32/100

“Alot of homework.”

⚖️

50/100

“she still gave me a C. She has no real way of on how much she likes you or not.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She organizes extra study .
  • she just copies all the examples and puts it on the board.
  • She teaches at the speed of lightning

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but she only will check the completsness not the Accuracy Rate
  • what effort you put in is what you get.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

and opposing viewpoints give a solid polarized picture despite older dates.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1888 reviews
MATH05021 review
PRECA1881 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values