AI Rate Professor

Business Administration

Art Baja

BA101A · BA101B · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take him if you will keep up with and self-study; avoid if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPatient explainerHomework-first orderTextbook PowerPointsAttendance mattersMixed difficulty
  • Most students find him patient, funny, and effective if they put in work.
  • is finished, which frustrates some.
  • One strongly negative review warns of fast pace and reluctance to answer questions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many say you do great if you read, do weekly HW for full credit, and attend, but self-study and timing make an A non-automatic.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty ranges from easy to hard; content is manageable when you keep pace but can feel quick and heavy.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Students call attendance important and and learning.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Four strong positives and one moderate review outweigh one strong avoid warning when students put in the work.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Weekly online HW can give full credit if completed; who prepare.

Format shift

In-person only; no online comparison.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and one easy project require steady time outside class.

Format shift

In-person only; no online comparison.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Most call him patient, funny, and effective, though one student felt he rushed and got upset at questions.

Format shift

In-person only; no online comparison.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and a project split assessment across practice and tests.

Format shift

In-person only; no online comparison.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person BA101 students mostly praise his care and explanations, with and one harsh outlier.

Main concern

; self-study required or you fall behind.

What students said

“He will gladly break things down and .”
BA101A
“you really have to spend some time on the course by yourself or you will be way behind”
BA101A
“ .”
BA101A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; and reading supports success.

Multiple choice examsTextbook-based exams3 exams

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

the textbook with three exams reported.

Multiple choice examsTextbook-based exams3 exams
“ textbook.”
BA101A
“3 exams and HW online every week(do it and get full credit)”
BA101A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Read the , and you'll do great.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person , and mixed outcomes. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“What the most important thing is that the way he teaches is attractive and effective.”

📚

48/100

“you have to do the to do it.”

👍 If You Work

72/100

“If you !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He will gladly break things down and .
  • He teaches well in class and he is funny.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • textbook.
  • HW online every week(do it and get full credit)
  • you will be way behind and

Theme 3

⚠️

  • .
  • If you really pay attention and try to pass then you will.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six in-person reviews from 2011-2012 show mostly positive consistency with ; sample is modest and dated.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BA101A5 reviews
BA101B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values