AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Jesus Ramirez

PHILO101 · PHIL101 · PHIL106 · PHILO107 · PHIL102 · PHIL100 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

if you want an engaging, fair, and generally easy path to a strong grade.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEngaging LecturerHelpful FeedbackSemi-Easy AClear Philosophy ExplanationsQuiz-Linked Exams
  • Students repeatedly call him one of the and engagement.
  • , and exams are manageable; notes and study guides help a lot.
  • work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Multiple students report easy quizzes, cake tests, and an A without heavy effort if they attend and .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

; a few still find content dry or a 3-hour night class hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Success is tied to going to class and taking notes; .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

93/100

and grades.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

and tests; essays are sometimes graded more strictly.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

few quizzes, papers, and exams described as cake.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students praise clear, engaging lectures and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of , and finals with quiz content feeding exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly positive: , and generally easy assessments with occasional stricter essays.

Main concern

Long night blocks and .

What students said

“ !”
PHIL101
“Just go to class and . ”
PHILO101
“ , but more importantly, to learn! .”
PHIL106

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; multiple-choice tests and study guides make exams student-friendly.

Quiz Questions on ExamsMultiple ChoiceStudy GuidesEasy Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; midterms and finals are mostly easy multiple choice with study guides.

Quiz Questions on ExamsMultiple ChoiceStudy Guides
“ have half of .”
PHILO101
“Midterm and quizzes.”
PHIL101
“There's two papers (4 pages each), 2 quizzes and 2 exams (all multiple choice).”
PHIL106

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , but more importantly, to learn! .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching clarity, easiness, and feedback. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“ ! FirSt tIme tAKing Philo but man This CLass Was Great.”

🅰️ Easy A Path

82/100

“I got a A in the course, and I must say I didnt really try and hard. Just go to class and ”

💡 Clarity & Engagement

90/100

“he helps us understand tough material... He makes philosophy not dry at all!”

📝

88/100

“I emailed him my paper before the , and he emailed me back with a whole page valuable comments!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lectures are interesting and clear
  • and engaging
  • the way Professor Ramirez goes over complicated and abstract concepts is incredible

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • 2 essays, 2 quizzes, 2 tests, all cake
  • though

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • wants in the paper
  • ! :)

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven detailed in-person reviews from 2010-2011 show strong consistency on teaching quality and easiness.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1064 reviews
PHIL1013 reviews
PHIL1001 review
PHIL1021 review
PHILO1011 review
Show 1 more courses
PHILO1071 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values