AI Rate Professor

Respiratory Therapy

Carol McNamee-Cole

RTFIRSTYEAR · RT101 · RT000 · RTSECT · RT02 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a dedicated RT lecturer who rewards sincere work, but be ready for occasional moodiness.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExcellent lecturerDedicated professionalWell organizedCaring but moodyClear explanations
  • and real dedication to Respiratory Therapy.
  • Homework and studying are expected; she is merciful if you put in work.
  • One older review labels her the madwoman of Ohlone for mood and temper.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

and study and she shows mercy, but the content is not a free A and effort is expected.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings are mixed and students stress studying and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and dedication despite one harsh personality critique.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Students say and she will have mercy, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Homework and studying are required, but comments do not describe an overwhelming load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Strong praise for , and dedication, offset by one temper complaint.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments emphasize homework and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person RT students mostly call her an if you do the work, with one strong complaint about temper.

Main concern

Can be ill-tempered or moody with students who seem rude or unprepared.

What students said

“She is dedicated to her profession and an excellent lecturer!”
RT101
“if it waznt for her, RT prog wuld suck! She is grt.”
RT000
“She is known as the madwoman of Ohlone for good reason.”
RTFIRSTYEAR

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; and studying.

Homework-focusedStudy-required

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

such as proctoring or open-book rules.

Homework emphasizedStudy for success
“ and study study”
RT02

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if it waznt for her, RT prog wuld suck! She is grt.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews spanning 2006-2009, highlighting teaching strength and mood concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“She is dedicated to her profession and an excellent lecturer!”

📚

82/100

“She teaches systematically and .”

⚠️ Personality Risk

35/100

“most of the time she is ill-tempered, angry, quick to blame, irrational, and a pain to be around”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • excellent lecturer
  • presents the information in a very easy to follow manner

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • super dedicated
  • Shez caring
  • always helpful and givs opp to ask her questions

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and study study
  • Pay attn to her u shuld hav no prob

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six mostly detailed reviews from 2006-2009 with consistent praise and one sharp dissent, but all are old and lack grade data.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

RT1012 reviews
RT0001 review
RT021 review
RTFIRSTYEAR1 review
RTSECT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values