AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Susan Gil

PSYCA160 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
6/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid Susan Gil for PSYC-A160; students report , and heavy workload with failing or .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderUnresponsiveLots of HomeworkSo Many PapersDo Not Take
  • Every review rates quality 1 with difficulty 5 and .
  • Communication failures include multi-week silence, ignored emails, and uneven due-date changes.
  • Heavy papers and and withdrawals.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Grades cluster at F or and no path described to an easy A.

Both online and no easy-A evidence.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Every review marks difficulty 5 with , and many papers.

High difficulty is consistent across online and in-person PSYC-A160 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory and one tags participation matters.

Four of ; only one in-person review said no.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

All five reviews and .

and in-person comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

and reported grades are F or withdrawal.

Format shift

evidence.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Tags and comments stress lots of homework, so many papers, and .

Format shift

Workload complaints are strongest in in-person reviews but .

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Universal quality-1 ratings cite no replies for weeks, arrogance, and uneven policies.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on silence and communication; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Comments emphasize papers, homework, and group projects more than exams.

Format shift

Neither format clearly describes exams; evidence is assignment and paper heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are blunt avoid , and many papers.

Main concern

Heavy paper and and Fs or withdrawals.

What students said

“ !”
PSYC-A160
“ ”
PSYC-A160

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report weeks without replies, medical leave with , and arrogant messaging.

Main concern

Professor is hard to reach and may leave the course unattended for weeks.

What students said

“didnt answer for three weeks and never updated during those three weeks, doesnt answer emails.”
PSYC-A160
“She is a very difficult professor to communicate with. She took 3 weeks off from our course for "medical reasons"”
PSYC-A160

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring.

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! didnt answer for three weeks and never updated during those three weeks, doesnt answer emails.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting avoid warnings, unresponsiveness, and harsh workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

5/100

“ ”

📭 Communication Failure

8/100

“didnt answer for three weeks and never updated during those three weeks, doesnt answer emails.”

📚 Heavy Workload

15/100

“She is a very difficult professor to communicate with. She took 3 weeks off from our course for "medical reasons", penalised me for having to do a ”

Theme 1

🚫 About Taking the Class

  • !
  • !

Theme 2

📭 About Communication

  • doesnt answer emails
  • difficult professor to communicate with
  • displays traits of arrogance vividly in her responses

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Work

  • Lots of homework
  • So many papers
  • Get ready to read

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five recent 2026 reviews are fully consistent on low quality and high difficulty, but sample size is small and some comments are very short.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PSYC-A1605 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1