AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Matthew Bollinger

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Proceed with caution; expect uneven treatment and occasional surprise workload.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUneven experienceSelective treatmentLecture heavySurprise projectsCaring (mixed)
  • one praises knowledge and artistic freedom, another reports unfair treatment
  • Surprise projects and
  • Both reviewers still earned As despite quality concerns

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Both students got As, but one found difficulty high and motivation-draining.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty reports split between easy-moderate and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One student strongly likes him; another felt unfairly treated and demotivated.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

Students still earned As, but fairness of treatment is disputed.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Projects and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Knows material and allows artistic freedom, but organization and fairness concerns hurt the experience.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Studio projects, sketchbook work, and surprise projects drive assessment.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

strong content knowledge for some, perceived favoritism and poor organization for others.

Main concern

Selective treatment and surprise projects can demotivate students.

What students said

“I feel like he treated me differently from the other students and I really don't know why.”
71680
“Professor Bollinger is a great teacher. He knows the material inside and out.”
71716

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on projects rather than traditional proctored exams.

Project-basedSurprise projects

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews focus on projects and surprise assignments, not formal exams.

Project-basedSurprise projects
“Just be prepared for when you are already in the middle of a bigger project.”
71716

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I feel like he treated me differently from the other students and I really don't know why when in the beginning I was all smiles towards him.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting reviews, highlighting fairness risk and project-based teaching. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Professor Bollinger is a great teacher. He knows the material inside and out.”

⚠️ Fairness Concerns

30/100

“He would tell me not to do something then would encourage someone else to do it.”

📦 Workload Surprises

45/100

“Just be prepared for .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He knows the material inside and out, and leaves room for .
  • and he's very selective.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just be prepared for .
  • It made me lose motivation to strive in my projects.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Fairness

  • I feel like he treated me differently from the other students.
  • He would tell me not to do something then would encourage someone else to do it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Only two recent reviews with sharply conflicting experiences lower reliability.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

716801 review
717161 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values