AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Ocean Cangelosi

PHIL200 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

if you want a low-effort A; avoid if you care about rigorous teaching or real philosophy content.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy ANo grading criteriaCompletion gradingOff-topic lecturesExtra credit
  • Nearly free A .
  • content ran out mid-semester and drifted into UFOs and AI.
  • if you want an easy grade, not deep philosophy learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

95/100

Student reports grades on completion with and .

All .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

94/100

and difficulty rated at the bottom; content was thin .

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory even though the work itself was extremely easy.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

as an easy A class, not as strong teaching; quality was rated 2/5.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

96/100

Described as essentially no criteria, grading mostly on completion with and group projects.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Featherlight

94/100

No essays or hard writing; student called the class hilariously easy.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Low quality rating and mid-semester content collapse into UFO rambling and AI tangents.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Completion work, group projects, and dominate; .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person PHIL-200 is described as hilariously easy with , and off-topic rambling once content ran out.

Main concern

Little real academic structure or .

What students said

“This class was hilariously easy, as Dr Cangelosi seems to have no grading criteria, pretty much grades on completion.”
PHIL-200
“halfway through the semester they ran out of content to teach and started rambling about UFOs.”
PHIL-200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize completion-style assessment and no hard writing rather than formal proctored exams.

Completion gradingNo difficult writingGroup projects

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person course appears graded mainly on completion and policy stated.

Completion gradingNo difficult writingGroup projects
“pretty much grades on completion. all.”
PHIL-200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I'd 100% take this class again for an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting free A . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Easy A Reality

95/100

“This class was hilariously easy, as Dr Cangelosi seems to have no grading criteria, pretty much grades on completion.”

⚠️ Teaching Gaps

28/100

“halfway through the semester they ran out of content to teach and started rambling about UFOs.”

👍

68/100

“I'd 100% take this class again for an easy A.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This class was hilariously easy
  • pretty much grades on completion
  • I'd 100% take this class again for an easy A.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • ran out of content to teach and started rambling about UFOs
  • also weirdly in love with AI

Theme 3

📋 About Course Design

  • all
  • Group projects

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Single detailed review only; vivid but not enough to confirm patterns across students or terms.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL-2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values