AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Dayana Hernandez

N210 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

experience may depend heavily on the section, and some students feel they teach themselves.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing lecturesCanvas organization praisedSaturday seminar frictionSkims PowerPointsClear when organized
  • and low-effort PowerPoint skimmer.
  • One student loved Canvas structure and ; another called class a waste of time.
  • and one section forced Saturday mornings due to schedule.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

Students report A and B+ with moderate difficulty, but effort still required and grades are mixed.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Difficulty ratings of 2-3 and no description of advanced content; main friction is delivery, not concept hardness.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and one review says students had to sacrifice Saturday morning for a short class.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One student strongly recommends her while another calls the seminar a waste of time.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

; reported grades are A and B+ without harsh grading claims.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Assignments and self-reading are expected; not described as crushing but not light either.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

One review praises amazing lectures and caring style; another says she only skims slides and makes students teach.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Assignments and class participation appear central; exams are not clearly detailed.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person N210 feedback is split: one praises organized Canvas and and makes students teach.

Main concern

Inconsistent teaching quality and inconvenient Saturday seminar scheduling.

What students said

“Gives clear instructions on assignments and expectations of the course. ”
N210
“All she does and expect students to read on our own whatever she did not finish”
N210

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

No clear exam policy describedAssignment and participation focus

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Assignments and expectations emphasizedParticipation matters
“ and expectations of the course.”
N210

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“All she does and expect students to read on our own whatever she did not finish, and makes students to teach the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 conflicting in-person reviews on lecture quality and scheduling. Credibility rating: Medium.

📊 Split Teaching Quality

50/100

“ and expectations of the course.”

👎 Low-Effort Lecture Critique

20/100

“All she does and expect students to read on our own whatever she did not finish”

📅

15/100

“many students had to sacrifice their Saturday morning to show to up for 50 minute class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Had everything very organized on Canvas which made it easy to review material.
  • All she does
  • makes students to teach the class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • B+
  • A
  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 3

Theme 3

⏰ About Schedule and Attendance

  • Yes
  • many students had to sacrifice their Saturday morning
  • What a waste of time!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

50/100

Evidence confidence

Two detailed but opposite in-person reviews create medium credibility with high polarization.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

N2102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values