AI Rate Professor

Engineering

David van Gogh

ENGR010 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take him for ENGR010 if you want a and communication pay off.

Best fit · Effort For RewardKind and caringLate and resubmit friendlyTough but fair graderHelpful feedbackFirst-year ENGR favorite
  • Kind, accessible ENGR010 instructor who prioritizes real learning
  • Lenient on late and resubmitted work if you communicate
  • , so perfect A is not automatic

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Late work and resubmits help a lot, but , complete work.

All evidence is from in-person ENGR010 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Intro engineering with moderate difficulty ratings and a learning-focused, supported pace.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

and urges others to take any class he teaches.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Generous on late and resubmit policies, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Standard engineering intro load with group projects and quality-focused assignments.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Kind, inspirational, always available, and focused on students actually learning the material.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and resubmits rather than exam talk.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ENGR010 is supportive and forgiving on deadlines, with strong help access and a learning-first mindset.

Main concern

and quality.

What students said

“very lenient on submitting assignments. Only ”
ENGR010
“ and resubmit old ones to get a better grade”
ENGR010
“Is a forgiving professor just as long as you contact or message him beforehand”
ENGR010

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews highlight assignment flexibility and .

Assignment focusedLate submissionsResubmitsGroup projects

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

75/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment centers on assignments with late and resubmit options; .

AssignmentsResubmitsLate workGroup projects
“ and resubmit old ones to get a better grade”
ENGR010
“ but wants you to learn how to have everything perfect”
ENGR010

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“any classes he has you should take him 100%.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person ENGR010 reviews, highlighting kindness, flexibility, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

❤️ Kind Instructor

93/100

“Mr. Vangogh is a very kind and caring instructor”

⚖️

78/100

“His priority is you learning the material. He's always happy to help.”

👍

95/100

“Would 100% recommend if you had the chance.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • always looking to help or answer any of the student's questions
  • always happy to help

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but wants you to learn
  • resubmit old ones to get a better grade

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Good prof and very kind
  • Inspirational
  • I wish other professors were more like him

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

3 recent detailed in-person reviews with consistent praise and .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR0103 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values