AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Andres Zamudio

PHILP122 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you can manage weekly reading and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSlow to replyHeavy readingSelf-taught workloadExtra credit availableUnresponsive emails
  • Multiple students say he rarely answers emails or Canvas messages.
  • but content difficulty is moderate.
  • Some still earn high grades and if and self-directed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Students report A and A+ grades are attainable with organization, but and .

Most grade evidence is from online sections; only one in-person review.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Content is not the hardest philosophy, yet volume of reading and .

Online and the and weekly work.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

75/100

as not mandatory for this primarily online course pattern.

Four of ; evidence is mostly online.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

and repeated frustration over zero communication outweigh moderate content praise.

Recommendation caveats appear mainly in .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grades range from B to A+ with , but and help is limited.

Format shift

and the in-person review.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Expect lots of , and .

Format shift

; in-person cites about four weekly assignments.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some call him knowledgeable, but slow speech, odd delivery, and ignored emails dominate the experience.

Format shift

Online reviews carry most teaching critiques including video delivery issues.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment is driven by weekly reading, annotations, and .

Format shift

Online comments detail weekly reading and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person review reports heavy weekly work and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“There is a lot of reading and about 4 assignments weekly. so good luck”
PHILP122

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and ; grades can be strong but communication is widely criticized.

Main concern

Professor often does not answer emails or .

What students said

“ ”
PHILP122
“he didn't answer his emails or ”
PHILP122
“ if you can keep up with the ”
PHILP122

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on weekly reading and homework; exams are not clearly described so .

Reading heavyWeekly homeworkExtra creditLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and about four weekly assignments without clear exam policy.

Lots of readingWeekly assignments
“There is a lot of reading and about 4 assignments weekly”
PHILP122

Online

Online evidence emphasizes weekly reading, annotations, and .

Weekly readingAnnotationsHomework assignmentsExtra credit
“Class consisted of reading, annotating, and ”
PHILP122

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting unresponsiveness and self-paced workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

📧 Communication Gap

20/100

“I have emails from two months ago that he never answered.”

📚 Workload Intensity

32/100

“There is a lot of reading and about 4 assignments weekly.”

🧭 Self-Directed Success

60/100

“ if you can keep up with the .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“every 5 seconds (genuinely not an exaggeration) he said "uhhh", he talks soooo slowly”

Theme 1

📬 About Communication

  • so good luck
  • he didn't answer his emails or

Theme 2

📖 About Workload

  • Get ready to read
  • Class consisted of reading, annotating, and
  • be ready to read and google a lot

Theme 3

🧠 About Content Fit

  • assigns the work that is very well beyond the grasp of someone who has not taken any philosophy classes before
  • not very difficult to do if and can manage time well

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews with consistent communication complaints but limited sample and .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PHILP1226 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1