AI Rate Professor

English

Alisa Lieberman

ENG101B · ENGLISH101 · ENG1A · ENGL1A45812 · ENGLISH1A · 101A · ENGLISH101B · ENG125 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
55.17%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want intensive English practice and can handle heavy writing; skip if you need a light or easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderLots of HomeworkHeavy BusyworkGood Feedback When EngagedPolarizing
  • Workload is heavy with many papers, summaries, and redundant assignments.
  • , though .
  • Experience and busywork machine.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

As and good grades happen, but , and .

Online reviews emphasize pointless busywork for little payoff; in-person students more often say effort earns an A.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard college English, but volume of reading and alone.

; online adds more busywork and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

and tags warn that skipping hurts your chance to pass.

Evidence of and in-person sections.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

; fans praise growth and feedback while critics say run from the busywork.

In-person recommendations are warmer; online recommendations are sharply divided and often negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Tough grader tags and complaints .

Format shift

Online students report unclear or delayed .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of homework, so many papers, weekly summaries, and simultaneous essays are constant themes.

Format shift

Online workload complaints are louder and more extreme than in-person ones.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Strong praise for caring lectures and and no learning.

Format shift

; online quality scores skew lower.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and discussion work rather than big exams.

Format shift

Both formats center papers and weekly writing rather than proctored tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more mixed and , and real writing growth when students put in work.

Main concern

and lots of reading or .

What students said

“I have really learned more in this class about literature then in my other English classes.”
ENGLISH101
“While she does grade strictly, she gives good foodback and .”
ENGLISH101B
“ . She provides no feedback on assignments, & the so pointless.”
ENGLISH101

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections draw the harshest complaints about , and little learning value.

Main concern

Repetitive summaries and .

What students said

“I did not learn anything valuable throughout the semester it just felt like there was only ever busy work. Avoid if you can.”
ENG101B
“You have to write at least 1,000 words a week. Be ware. Stay away from this online course.”
ENGLISH101
“didnt grade for more than a month”
101A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on papers and assignments; .

Essay heavyReading responsesRewrite opportunitiesFew clear exam details

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments also emphasize essays and .

EssaysRewrite opportunitiesParticipation
“she gives good foodback and .”
ENGLISH101B
“the . I learned a lot.”
ENGLISH101

Online

Online comments center essays, summaries, and .

Weekly essaysSummariesDiscussion boards
“read lecture and summarize twice; ... ”
ENGLISH101
“ and get the grade.”
ENG101B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ redundant, and a HUGE waste of my time. On top of all that she takes points off without explaining why. DO NOT take this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 36 reviews spanning online and , and polarized teaching. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Intensity

22/100

“This teacher makes you do so much tedious, timewasting, pointless work.”

⚖️

34/100

“While she does grade strictly, she gives good foodback and .”

🎯 Teaching Split

55/100

“I really loved the readings and all the .”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“I would ignore any negative reviews about her and !”

Theme 1

📝

  • Lots of homework, So many papers
  • write at least 1,000 words a week
  • multiple summaries about pointless things

Theme 2

⚖️

Theme 3

❤️

  • She also gives so
  • takes time to get to know YOU

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

36

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

36 detailed reviews span 2014-2025 with consistent workload and and in-person formats.

Inside 36 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 57
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ENGLISH10122 reviews
101A5 reviews
ENG101B4 reviews
ENG1251 review
ENG1A1 review
Show 3 more courses
ENGL1A458121 review
ENGLISH101B1 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

9

A 7 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 2