AI Rate Professor

History

Jesse Stevens

HISTP117 · HISTP101 · P117 · DOW319 · HISTP102 · HIST118 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
51/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
62.07%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you will track the ; easy material can still tank your grade if you miss his scoring rules.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture HeavyUnclear Grading RubricEasy ContentExtra CreditPolarizing
  • Course content and weekly work are often described as easy if you keep up.
  • A rigid or report fails.
  • Lectures are either deep and passionate or long and boring depending on the student.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students get A or A+ with light work, but the .

Both formats report easy content; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Students repeatedly say the history content and if you show up and finish work.

In-person and online and textbook work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

38/100

and note lecture-to-quiz dependence.

; a few say no.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

; fans love easy lectures while critics warn of .

In-person has more glowing multi-semester fans; online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

36/100

and second chances exist, but several students report fails with 87-95% under unclear rules.

Format shift

Online reviews stress fail-with-high-percent more than in-person.

Workload

Light

68/100

Weekly textbook questions and quizzes are common and usually called easy, not overwhelming.

Format shift

Both formats describe light weekly work; some in-person call lectures long.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Passionate deep lectures for some, monotone and unhelpful for others, with recent communication issues.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is stronger; online quality is more polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Weekly quizzes, textbook work, group projects, and .

Format shift

; online stresses weekly quizzes and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

history teacher or slam boring lectures and .

Main concern

Lecture-heavy style plus grading rules that can fail near-A students.

What students said

“Easily the . His classes are VERY easy and simple.”
HISTP117
“i failed with an 87% because of an .”
HISTP117
“His lectures will make you fall asleep. very monotone and just boring.”
HIST118

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but include sharp warnings about failing despite high percentages and poor communication.

Main concern

high scores.

What students said

“ . Failing students that have over 95% in the class with no clarification on how or why.”
HIST118
“ . Doesn't know how to communicate correctly.”
HISTP101
“It was pretty easy. of the pandemic.”
HISTP101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are mostly weekly quizzes and textbook work with occasional written midterms.

Weekly quizzesTextbook questionsBlue book midtermPop quizzesRetake-friendly quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and at least one handwritten blue-book midterm.

Blue book midtermWeekly quizzesPop quizzesLecture-based
“ , and a short essay. It was all hand written in the blue book.”
P117
“There's a , but they tell you the answers on your first attempt so .”
HIST118

Online

Online evidence points to weekly quizzes and textbook review with .

Weekly quizzesTextbook review questionsUnclear grading system
“quiz and textbook review questions every Sunday.”
HISTP101
“A student with over 95% percent in this class can be failed over a .”
HIST118

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“i failed with an 87% because of an . I have never heard of someone failing with a near A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 history reviews, . Credibility rating: High.

📗 Course Easiness

72/100

“His classes are VERY easy and simple, there is absolutely zero excuse for failing his classes.”

⚠️

36/100

“Failing students that have over 95% in the class with no clarification on how or why.”

🎙️ Lecture Style

54/100

“His lectures are very interesting and incredibly thorough. He clearly knows what he's talking about.”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“Ignore negative reviews; they usually come from students who didn't put in the effort.”

Theme 1

📖 About Lectures

  • Amazing lectures
  • lectures are sooo boring
  • He can teach any sort of history with his eyes closed

Theme 2

📊 About Grades & Rubrics

  • Graded by few things
  • failed with an 87%

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • doesn't give tons of homework

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

29 reviews from 2017-2026 show a stable split between easy-content praise and .

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 510

Course coverage

HIST1189 reviews
HISTP1018 reviews
HISTP1176 reviews
HISTP1024 reviews
DOW3191 review
Show 1 more courses
P1171 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 7 · A 12

B range

0

No reported values

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

3

D 1 · D- 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values