AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Bob Johnson

HMSV105 · HMSV101 · PSY101 · PSYCH133 · PHSY101 · HUMANSERVICES · PSYCH101A · PSYCH101 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a passionate, real-world psychology or human services mentor and can handle firm classroom expectations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCritical thinking focusReal-life applicationStudent advocateFirm classroom boundariesInspirational mentor
  • Students call him one of the and teaching real-life critical thinking
  • he enforces boundaries and will call out dishonesty or disruption
  • Older sparse reviews still consistently praise knowledge and investment in students

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

and , but the subject can be deep and he expects engagement rather than free grades.

; grade data is sparse beyond a couple of A reports.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

, yet some courses are in-depth and demand critical thinking.

; difficulty averages moderate with a wide range.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Recent comments mark attendance mandatory, and .

Evidence comes only from in-person reviews; as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Would-take-again is 100% where reported, and multiple students call him among the .

All recommendation evidence is in-person; many but praise him strongly.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

for showing up and , but he is not a soft touch on effort or integrity.

Format shift

Only in-person comments; few explicit grade distributions beyond reported A's.

Workload

Light

72/100

Students mention few essays, book-based tests, and lectures that .

Format shift

All and newer terms.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Praised as knowledgeable, open to questions, personally invested, and focused on critical thinking and student wellbeing.

Format shift

In-person only; a minority note the class can suck or .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

Tests are book-based and ; essays are usually not required.

Format shift

In-person comments mention book-based tests and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students describe an inspirational, knowledgeable professor who invests extra time, pushes critical thinking, and holds firm boundaries.

Main concern

Can feel intimidating; little sympathy for apathy, sleeping, or phone use in class.

What students said

“He's an amazing teacher and his style is easy, real-life application.”
PSYCH101A
“ !”
HMSV105
“No sympathy for apathy in his class, will kick you out for sleeping or answering the phone”
HMSV101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear book-based with and attendance-linked , without proctoring software mentions.

Book-based testsPossible take-home testsExtra credit for attendance

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as book-based, and ; lectures reinforce book topics.

Book-based testsTake-home tests possibleLectures enhance book topics
“ . Lectures enhance the different book topics.”
PSYCH101
“he just might send a .”
PSYCH101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“All in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person reviews spanning many years, highlighting mentorship, firmness, and critical thinking. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“Bob was an inspiration to me. He personally invested in my education an spent time outside of class to make sure I got the material down.”

🧠 Critical Thinking

84/100

“He likes to make you use your entire brain! Critical Thinking!”

👍 Campus Reputation

88/100

“by far one of the ”

⚖️ Firm Boundaries

70/100

“No sympathy for apathy in his class, will kick you out for sleeping or answering the phone, I've seen it!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his style is easy, real-life application
  • live in now
  • Very conscientious providing info. to students so they can think for themselves

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Loving human being
  • Concerned about the wellbeing of his students
  • If EVER you have a problem with another teacher not listening/being bias to you, he will stand up for you!

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he gives you plenty of chances to earn a couple points
  • Takes some getting used to

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Ten mostly older in-person reviews (2002-2025) show consistent tone but sparse grades, tags, and recent detail reduce confidence.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HUMANSERVICES2 reviews
PSYCH1012 reviews
HMSV1011 review
HMSV1051 review
PHSY1011 review
Show 3 more courses
PSY1011 review
PSYCH101A1 review
PSYCH1331 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values