AI Rate Professor

English

Kimberly Horg

P101A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Skip the online section; only consider in person if and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderHeavy Paper LoadWeak FeedbackFormat DependentTime-Consuming Assignments
  • and useless long assignments.
  • In-person students report real writing growth and new authors.
  • As and A-minuses appear, but and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Students still report A or A-minus, but and .

; the single in-person review did not discuss grade difficulty.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Difficulty ratings sit at 4 to 5 with many papers and .

Online and ; only tone of teaching differs.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

as not mandatory while the .

; in-person evidence says yes.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Only , and online comments actively warn others away.

; both online reviewers give low quality and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough grader tags and comments about harsh or .

Format shift

Harsh grading language is online-only; .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of homework and so many papers tags appear twice, with .

Format shift

; in-person review focuses on learning, not load.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

and low quality; one in-person student found the class enjoyable and useful.

Format shift

Online quality scores are 1 to 2; the lone in-person score is 5.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Comments center on papers and .

Format shift

Paper-heavy load is explicit online; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and improved writing.

Main concern

, so experience may not generalize.

What students said

“I really enjoyed Professor Horg's class. She introduced me to a lot of new authors and I learned to write better.”
P101A

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online P101A , and almost no useful feedback.

Main concern

paper load.

What students said

“Gives long, unnecessary assignments that don't improve a student's ability .”
P101A
“ and .”
P101A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Online reviews focus on papers and homework; .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have this class, good luck.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (2 online, 1 in person), highlighting split format experience and . Credibility rating: Low.

📝 Paper Overload

25/100

“Gives long, unnecessary assignments that don't improve a student's ability .”

📉

30/100

“When it comes .”

✍️ In-Person Growth

70/100

“She introduced me to a lot of new authors and I learned to write better.”

Theme 1

📚

  • and .
  • and .
  • , So many papers

Theme 2

🧑‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Asking questions doesn't mean that there will be an answer.
  • I really enjoyed Professor Horg's class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews across two years with and limited detail consistency.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

P101A3 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values