AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sherrie Burges

STATS0 · MATHP115 · MATHP122 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Consider her if you show up, ask for help, and can handle uneven group work; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizingGroup ProjectsRetake-Friendly OnlineTough Grader (Some)Helpful When Present
  • and inspirational to rude and harsh.
  • Online stats can be strong with unlimited , but one section had bad group freeloading.
  • In and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

and participation points help, but tough project grading and .

; in-person reviews include harsh project and assignment scores.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Math and stats content is manageable with help, but not universally light or introductory for weaker students.

Online and in-person both describe moderate difficulty with .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Multiple reviews mark attendance mandatory or warn that skipping hurts, especially in person.

In-person evidence is stricter; one as no.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; experience hinges on section format, group dynamics, and whether you get her helpful side.

In-person and online each show one strongly positive and one strongly negative recent-era review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Some sections feel supportive; others report tough unexplained scores on group work and large projects.

Format shift

; in-person tough-grader tags are more common.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

, and lectures form a standard college math load.

Format shift

Online emphasizes weekly HW, quizzes, and three group labs; in .

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Students either find her calm, helpful, and inspirational or feel she posts links and .

Format shift

Positive teaching comments appear in both formats; the sharpest teaching complaints are online link-posting and in-person rudeness.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and participation rather than pure exams.

Format shift

Online MATHP122 highlights retakeable HW and quizzes plus labs; in person mentions projects and attendance credit.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews range from amazingly helpful and .

Main concern

Some students report harsh unexplained scores and .

What students said

“she was amazing. Not only was she very helpful with the class itself but ”
MATHP115
“Shes a very rude professor. She grades very tough”
MATHP115
“I'm not very good at math and she took the time to help me when I requested it”
STATS0

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online stats section felt like link-posting with unfair group grades; another praised unlimited HW and , notes, and easy labs.

Main concern

if everyone gets the same grade.

What students said

“I didn't really feel like she did any teaching as she usually just posted links to stuff”
STATS0
“HW and Quiz were due on Sundays, both of ”
MATHP122

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is moderate; online help, while projects and .

Unlimited Quiz RetakesGroup LabsHomework HeavyLecture Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize lecture-heavy classes, projects, and .

Lecture HeavyProjectsAttendance Linked Credit
“She grades very tough, she gave my group a 5/20 on an ”
MATHP115
“My advice is to definitely show up to class to understand everything”
MATHP115

Online

Online stats offers unlimited HW and plus group labs; one section had weak teaching via posted links.

Unlimited Quiz RetakesGroup LabsPosted Notes and Tutorials
“HW and Quiz were due on Sundays, both of ”
MATHP122
“she usually just posted links to stuff”
STATS0

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I took this Stats course online. HW and Quiz were due on Sundays, both of . ... Overall great online course!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (2 online, 3 in person), highlighting polarized teaching and format-specific assessment. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

54/100

“she was amazing. Not only was she very helpful with the class itself but ”

⚠️ Polarizing Experience

50/100

“Shes a very rude professor. She grades very tough”

🔄

58/100

“HW and Quiz were due on Sundays, both of ”

👥

40/100

“Me and one girl did all the work and everyone benefitted from the same grade”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She helps students when needed and makes sure everyone understands the topics
  • Very easy to talk to and calm
  • I didn't really feel like she did any teaching as she usually just posted links to stuff

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She grades very tough
  • Also got a C- on a 90 page project

Theme 3

👥 About Group Work

  • The
  • Everyone in the group got the same grade
  • 3 group labs which were fairly easy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews from 2012 to 2024 are detailed but small and polarized, so confidence is moderate rather than high.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATHP1152 reviews
STATS02 reviews
MATHP1221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1