AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sherie Burgess

MATHP122 · STATS · MATHP115 · MATHP051 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if and seek help, but avoid if you need a low-effort or highly guided online math class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful when engagedLots of homeworkGroup projectsClear when presentPolarized by format
  • Older in-person stats and and support.
  • , and weak online explanation.
  • ; success usually requires self-teaching and steady practice.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some call it easy A with ; others need hard work for a B and .

; recent online feels harder due to sparse teaching.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Stats and algebra content is manageable with practice but often described as , and .

In-person difficulty varies by term; .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is sometimes optional, but participation and .

Evidence is mostly in-person; online uses fixed weekly Pearson deadlines instead of seat time.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Majority of , while recent frustrated reviews pull the overall tone down.

In-person recommendations are stronger; newest online review is clearly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Extra credit and , but tough-grader tags and limited appear in negative reviews.

Format shift

; online frustration centers on deadlines more than grade harshness.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and multi-chapter assignments with short turnarounds are common.

Format shift

; in-person adds labs/projects, online adds Pearson Sunday deadlines.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

and helps students who struggle with math; recent online delivery is poorly received.

Format shift

Stronger lecture reputation in person; online complaints .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and final.

Format shift

Online leans Pearson tests plus recorded exams; but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Many students call her caring with great lectures and an achievable B/A with homework; some , and self-teaching.

Main concern

and occasional unclear or overcomplicated teaching.

What students said

“Do the and quizzes and this class will be an easy A!”
MATHP122
“She assigned about 3-4 chapters of homework and gave you 4 days to do it.”
MATHP122
“Dr. Burgess was the ... made the material easy to understand.”
STATS

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and recorded exams; one older hybrid review was positive.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“For the midterm and .”
MATHP122
“When you reach out to her she doesn't get back to you until a week later or so”
MATHP122
“ and . I had no problems in her class.”
MATHP051

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, while online midterms/finals are recorded.

Recorded online examsTake-home quizzes (in person)Pearson homework/testsNotation practice mirrors exams

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and notation practice often mirrors midterm/final content.

Take-home quizzes with notesFew quizzes and tests for some termsNotation work mirrors exams
“the , so you can use your notes.”
MATHP122
“notation assignment... are the same thing just the numbers are different. so practice the notation many times and you'll pass the .”
MATHP122

Online

One and ; tests also run on Pearson.

Recorded midterm and finalPearson assignments and tests
“For the midterm and .”
MATHP122
“Assignments and at 11 pm”
MATHP122

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As someone who does not normally do well AT ALL in math.. I passed this class with a B! Great professor!”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews (3 online, 12 in person), balancing praise for support with workload and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📘 Lecture Clarity (When Present)

75/100

“Dr. Burgess gave great lectures and made the material easy to understand.”

📚

30/100

“She assigned about 3-4 chapters of homework and gave you 4 days to do it.”

🎥

35/100

“For the midterm and .”

🤝 Helpful for Non-Math Students

80/100

“i suck at math. Burgess can get through to anybody.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Shes a
  • She and
  • She is very good at explaining the material

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do the and quizzes and this class will be an easy A
  • You definitely have to put in the work to get a good grade
  • Pretty boring class plus

Theme 3

📦 About Workload

  • Lots lots of reading
  • She gives busy work and not much time to complete
  • Assignments and at 11 pm

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

15 reviews with detailed comments across years, but strong polarization between older praise and recent complaints lowers consistency.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATHP1229 reviews
MATHP0514 reviews
MATHP1151 review
STATS1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1