AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Lucinda Vasquez

CHDVP144 · P119 · CHDVP119 · CHDV119 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Skip if and timely feedback; only consider if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring monotone lecturesUnclear instructionsLots of homeworkTextbook answer strictMixed kindness
  • Many students call lectures boring and monotone with .
  • Work can be easy if you copy textbook answers, but grading and .
  • Communication and grade posting problems appear in both formats, especially online.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Content and assignments can be easy, but strict textbook wording and .

Online often says copy the book to pass; in person adds strict answer expectations.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Students repeatedly call the work easy and book-search based, even when the class feels boring.

Both formats describe easy content; teaching quality is the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

and optional in others, with little consistency.

In-person more often mandatory; online is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and frequent would-not-recommend language outweigh older positive comments.

Negative tone appears in both online and in-person recent reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

, and reports of lower grades when she dislikes a student reduce leniency.

Format shift

Strictness appears in both formats; .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and multi-page research work are common.

Format shift

and in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Common themes are monotone lectures, unclear instructions, weak answers to questions, and .

Format shift

Both formats criticize teaching clarity; a few older reviews are warmer.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

24/100

, and weekly book-based tasks more than formal exams.

Format shift

Assignment-heavy in both formats.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews , and strict textbook-answer expectations.

Main concern

and lectures that do not answer questions well.

What students said

“ .”
CHDVP119
“Her lectures are extremely boring and she hops back and forth with information.”
CHDVP119
“EASY but BORING. Changes the and LAST minute.”
CHDV119

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students say work can be book-based and passable, but , and grade posting are often poor.

Main concern

and rude or .

What students said

“The , and .”
CHDVP119
“ and was very rude with her feedback. .”
CHDV119
“Basically, just copy what the book says and you'll pass.”
CHDVP119

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention papers, menus, and finals but .

Research paperWeekly book assignmentsFinal mentionedNo clear proctoring details

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments stress textbook-exact answers and a multi-page .

Textbook-exact answers5-page research essay
“Very strict of what to put on the answers which have to be straight from the textbook.”
CHDVP119
“We had to do a 5 page research essay!”
CHDVP119

Online

Online students mention a research paper, menu, and rules.

Research paperFinal assignmentBook-based questions
“The , and .”
CHDVP119
“A discussion post and 2 assignments each week, which were each 3-5 questions with all the answers found in the book.”
CHDVP119

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . ... Never answers questions directly and is horrible and giving instructions for assignments.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews (3 online, 7 in person), highlighting teaching clarity, workload, and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Doesn't know how to teach. EASY but BORING.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“ and there are lots of assignments!”

⚖️

34/100

“she's very rude about trying to talk about questions you have of the work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She so mono toned
  • Her lectures are extremely boring
  • Doesn't know how to teach

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Basically, just copy what the book says and you'll pass
  • EASY but BORING
  • Easy A so long as you complete all of your assignments

Theme 3

💬

  • was very rude with
  • Changes the and LAST minute

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across 2013-2023 with recurring themes of , and unclear instructions support a stable pattern.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CHDVP1195 reviews
CHDV1192 reviews
CHDVP1442 reviews
P1191 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values