AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Karen Bishop

SOCIOLOGY101 · SOC140 · SOCIP101 · SOCIOLGY · SOC101 · SOCIOP101 · SOCI102 · SOCIOLOY · SOCIP170 · SOCIOLOGY · SOCI101 · SOCIP102 · SOCI101A · SOCI150 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
64.29%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will keep up with reading and writing; if you want a light Easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring mentorLots of readingHeavy writing loadExtra credit availableClear grading criteria
  • Many , and passion for sociology
  • Workload is often heavy with journals, reading, and papers
  • and dropped low grades can rescue a

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A is reachable with steady work and , but and heavy writing keep it from being a free A.

Online notes and dropped grades; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is manageable with reading, but pace and volume of .

Online compressed courses feel harder; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and stress showing up or participating.

; many other online and in-person reviews list yes.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most praise care and learning value, while a vocal minority rejects the workload and .

Both formats show strong fans and workload critics; overall recommendation stays positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and help, but tough-grader and poor-grade complaints keep it only fair.

Format shift

; in-person mixed.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Repeated lots of , and big papers define the experience.

Format shift

Online 6-week formats are especially stacked; .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and passion despite occasional unhelpful or offline issues.

Format shift

In-person warmth is strong; online is more polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of participation, journals, papers, and .

Format shift

Online often test-heavy plus journals; and field work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In person , and passionate, with and field journals rewarded for organized students.

Main concern

Volume of papers, reading, and field journals can overwhelm.

What students said

“ . She is always ready to help her students.”
SOCI101
“There is a lot of work doing a field journal but as long as you keep up with it , it isn't a big deal!!!!”
SOCIP102
“She assigned so much work and often graded poorly”
SOCI101

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and caring for many, but compressed terms bring , and some nonresponse complaints.

Main concern

, and busywork in short online terms.

What students said

“The . Everything you need to succeed in there. Follow the instructions and do your work. You'll pass.”
SOCIOLGY
“Karen is a and test-heavy.”
SOCI150
“this professor WANTS you to succeed. She drops the 5 lowest participation grades and .”
SOCIP170

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are present and can be tough, but dropped low scores and .

Chapter testsDropped lowest testParticipation gradesField journals

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

than proctoring details.

Reading and short essaysField journal
“she makes you read a chapter or two every night and write a ”
SOCI101
“The if you read the chapter.”
SOCI101

Online

Online comments mention tests, participation, journals, and ; .

Test heavyDropped lowest testExtra creditParticipation grades
“Karen is a and test-heavy.”
SOCI150
“She drops the 5 lowest participation grades and .”
SOCIP170

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“this professor WANTS you to succeed. She drops the 5 lowest participation grades and . In reality I should've had a C in her class, but her boosted me to an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews, and writing. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Student Care

85/100

“She really cares for her students. .”

📚 Heavy Workload

28/100

“If you are interested in a 6000-word minimum/25-page minimum entry journal, and required four-hour community service within a span of a summer class, then you are in luck!”

🎯

80/100

“She gives good feedback on all assignments. .”

👍 Recommendation Split

72/100

“If you are not scared off by having to do a moderately high amount of !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is great. Just communicate with her. The .
  • Her lectures are very eye opening. She's very passionate about what she teaches
  • Professional Professor, a true Sociologist!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She assigned so much work and often graded poorly
  • boosted me to an A
  • expect to complete moderate amounts of work and be sure to attend functions and you'll be sure to ace the class.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Definitely a gem at PC.
  • She's the ultimate instructor!!!
  • she helped me power through it and was very encouraging.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

42 reviews across many years with , and care themes that stay fairly consistent.

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 56
3 out of 59
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

SOCI1018 reviews
SOC1017 reviews
SOCIP1015 reviews
SOCIP1025 reviews
SOCIOLOGY4 reviews
Show 10 more courses
SOC1402 reviews
SOCIOLGY2 reviews
SOCIP1702 reviews
1011 review
SOCI101A1 review
SOCI1021 review
SOCI1501 review
SOCIOLOGY1011 review
SOCIOLOY1 review
SOCIOP1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

7

A 6 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values