AI Rate Professor

Music

Nicholas Walters

MUSCP111 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

if you need the music credit and can grind boring lectures and heavy work for a fair but not free pass.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderLots of homeworkBoring lecturesSkip class you failHelpful if you ask
  • Both online reviews rate quality 3 and difficulty 5 with .
  • Lectures are long and boring but matter for tests; credit must be earned.
  • and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

and earn-it credit mean an A .

Evidence is entirely from two Online MUSCP111 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Both students set difficulty at 5 with and .

Evidence is entirely from Online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and participation-matters tags signal strict presence expectations.

Evidence is entirely from Online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Both reviewers said they would not take him again despite calling him merely alright.

Evidence is entirely from Online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

; grades reasonably only if you fully earn credit.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of , and long lectures drive a heavy load.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Described as alright and willing to help, but lectures run long and boring.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Tests depend on lectures while homework and .

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online MUSCP111 feels hard and talk-heavy; students say he is alright and will help if you do the work, but .

Main concern

Boring and lots of homework.

What students said

“Walters is a alright teacher but he talks way too much. His lectures are important for the tests but they are very boring.”
MUSCP111
“If you do the work you will pass. He tries and works with you and if you need help he will assist you.”
MUSCP111

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book policy.

Lecture-based tests

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Lectures matter for tests but not described.

Lecture-based tests
“His lectures are important for the tests but they are very boring.”
MUSCP111

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Walters is a alright teacher but he talks way too much. His lectures are important for the tests but they are very boring.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 Online reviews, highlighting lecture length, workload, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Walters was alright but helps. If you do the work you will pass.”

👎

15/100

“No”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“ ? You won't pass., Lots of homework”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he talks way too much
  • lectures are important for the tests but they are very boring
  • He tries and works with you

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He grades reasonably but if you want credit you have to earn it
  • If you do the work you will pass

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two same-course Online reviews from mid-2020 with matching mid quality scores and no grades.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MUSCP1112 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values