AI Rate Professor

English

Nicole Celaya

ENG71 · P071 · ENGLP050 · ENGL101A · ENGLP05001 · ENGP071 · ENG101A · ENG50 · ENGLPO50 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless you want a heavy, strict writing bootcamp and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy Homework LoadUnhelpful FeedbackMandatory AttendancePolarizing
  • Many students call her a and a large research paper
  • Helpfulness is a major complaint; she often redirects students to handouts
  • A minority say you learn a lot if you follow the rubric and work hard

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and many low grades mean an A usually requires constant grind, not luck.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students report , and a demanding end-of-term research paper.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance is repeatedly marked mandatory with .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and most recent comments warn others not to enroll.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and comments about losing points for minor issues dominate the sample.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

, and a long research essay make the load feel heavy.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

A few students feel they learned a lot, but more describe unhelpful, boring, or hostile instruction.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Essays, journals, homework, and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person English with Celaya is often described as high-volume reading and and frequent complaints about unhelpful, harsh experiences.

Main concern

, and perceived lack of support dominate many reviews.

What students said

“I honestly dont think she cares about her students.”
ENGL101A
“There is so . Expect .”
ENG101A
“She is very blunt and can be quite a .”
ENG101A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment leans on frequent writing and a large research paper with .

Essay HeavyResearch PaperHomework DrivenTough Grading

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work centers on essays, homework, and a ; proctoring details are not clearly described.

Frequent Essays10-Page Research PaperTough Essay GradingHomework Points
“She thinks everyone is an English major and assigns a 10 page research paper at the end of the semester.”
ENG101A
“She is TOUGH and is very specific when it comes to citing your quotes.”
ENG101A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 in-person , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“The most awful professor Ive had, ever.”

⚖️

18/100

“ most insignificant things.”

📚 Heavy Workload

22/100

“Assigns A LOT of work. She is a .”

👎 Low Recommendation

22/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , so dont bother asking her anything AT ALL.
  • She didn't seem to want to help me at all.
  • You actually learn something.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • There is so .
  • If you are looking for an A .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • I loved Nicole! I learned so much from her class.
  • Terrible teacher. She is only there for the job not for the students.
  • She even went as far as to make inappropriate racial comments.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

, detailed, and mostly consistent recent picture of tough grading and heavy work.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 55
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENG101A14 reviews
ENGL101A3 reviews
ENG712 reviews
ENG501 review
ENGLP0501 review
Show 4 more courses
ENGLP050011 review
ENGLPO501 review
ENGP0711 review
P0711 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

3

D 3

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values