AI Rate Professor

Information Systems

Xay Xiong

INTROWEBDESIG · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

if you already want information systems and can handle dense once-a-week technical content.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerSmart tech instructorHeavy terminologyOnce-a-week loadHard intro course
  • Student calls him the smartest tech person on campus.
  • Hardship was tied to dense weekly content and terminology, not personal teaching failure.
  • The only reviewer dropped after deciding information systems was not a fit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

The only student dropped and rated difficulty at maximum, so an easy A path is not supported.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Dense terminology and once-a-week information load made intro web design feel extremely hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

once-a-week meeting pattern.

No online evidence; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Student respects his expertise but still dropped after finding the content and major mismatch too hard.

Single in-person review only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

drop and high difficulty rating.

Format shift

/Withdrawal.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Too much information packed into once-a-week meetings made the load feel excessive.

Format shift

Workload comments come from the sole in-person review.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Called the smartest tech in the school; hardness is blamed more on content volume than poor teaching.

Format shift

One in-person quality rating of 3 with respectful praise.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly show whether .

Format shift

No assessment breakdown in the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

expertise but reports too much weekly information and a drop.

Main concern

Once-a-week format packed with terminology made the course feel overwhelming.

What students said

“Smartest tech in the school. That being said, his class was hard not because of the professor but we only met once a week and there was to much information and terminology was hard.”
INTROWEBDESIG

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

in reviews.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Smartest tech in the school. That being said, his class was hard not because of the professor but we only met once a week and there was to much information and terminology was hard.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review. Credibility rating: Low.

🧠 Instructor Expertise

70/100

“Smartest tech in the school.”

🔥 Content Overload

15/100

“we only met once a week and there was to much information and terminology was hard.”

🚪

25/100

“ . It was hard but found out information systems was not for me.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Smartest tech in the school.
  • his class was hard not because of the professor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • there was to much information and terminology was hard.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2014 in-person review with a and limited policy detail, so reliability is low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

INTROWEBDESIG1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1