AI Rate Professor

English

Drew Stutsman

ENG1A · ENG1B · ENG83 · ENG71 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you can decode vague prompts and self-manage an English class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear AssignmentsBoring LecturesUnfair Paper GradesAwkward PresenceInconsistent Help
  • Most reviews call lectures boring and .
  • and sometimes harsh.
  • One student found him available for help, but that view is the minority.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

and with effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content itself is not praised as hard, but poor teaching makes it feel harder than it should.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

, and unfair grading.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

Students report , and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Papers and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Boring lectures, nervous delivery, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Paper grades and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

delivery, and unfair paper grades for most reviewers.

Main concern

Unclear assignment expectations and .

What students said

“ ; two of us received "C's" because it wasn't what he wanted.”
ENG1B
“ and he gets an attitude when you ask him some questions.”
ENG83
“ and he even bring some peanuts to class.”
ENG71
“He was really strickt and .”
ENG83

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews center on paper .

Paper-Based Assessment

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not clearly prove exam proctoring or open-book rules; .

Paper-Based Assessment
“He was really strickt and .”
ENG83

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ; two of us received "C's" because it wasn't what he wanted. But the prompt stated otherwise.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews spanning 2009-2013, emphasizing clarity and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“He's boring, doesn't know what to say at times, and he's supposed to be the teacher.”

⚖️

25/100

“He was really strickt and .”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“ and he gets an attitude when you ask him some questions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • boring teacher
  • seems very nervous when he is lecturing
  • didnt' look like he even wanted to be there most of the time

Theme 2

📝

  • answers your question with a joke or another question

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • bring some peanuts to class
  • stares at you when your are talking, but every intensely

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews across 2009-2013 mostly agree on poor clarity, with one positive outlier.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1A1 review
ENG1B1 review
ENG711 review
ENG831 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values