AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Art Cowley

MATH61 · MATHALL · MATH2 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Good math choice if you want a careful, high-integrity explainer and can accept limited review volume.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyThorough TeacherClear ExplainerHigh IntegrityGood Morals
  • , and strong on problem-solving methods.
  • Difficulty looks manageable with quality scores near the top.
  • three short, older math reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Low average difficulty and warm quality ratings point to an A that is reachable without extreme grind.

Effort .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Difficulty ratings trend low and students do not describe abstract or crushing concepts.

All course-easiness evidence is in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Students label him a great, thorough, good teacher with high quality scores.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Low difficulty paired with strong .

Format shift

No letter grades reported; inference from in-person tone only.

Workload

Light

68/100

Comments focus on teaching .

Format shift

Workload not detailed beyond low difficulty ratings.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Thorough explanations, integrity, and .

Format shift

All three reviews are in-person.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

No format-specific assessment breakdown is available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person math students , and solid integrity with relatively low difficulty.

Main concern

Very few short reviews and almost no detail on workload or exams.

What students said

“Great teacher. Very thorough and had lots of integrity. High morals and an actual good teacher.”
MATHALL
“good at explaning material.”
MATH2
“very good”
MATH61

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

.

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tools.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great teacher. Very thorough and had lots of integrity. High morals and an actual good teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person math reviews, highlighting thorough teaching. Credibility rating: Low.

📐 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Great teacher. Very thorough and had lots of integrity.”

🗣️

85/100

“good at explaning material.”

👍 Overall Praise

86/100

“very good”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very thorough and had lots of integrity.
  • good at explaning material.
  • This Professor taught me how to solve problems vertically and horizontally

Theme 2

📗 About Overall Impression

  • High morals and an actual good teacher.
  • very good

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Three short reviews from 2007-2010 with almost no grades, tags, or assessment detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH21 review
MATH611 review
MATHALL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values