AI Rate Professor

English

Susana Johnson

ENG101A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
40/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you can attend every day and constantly verify your grade; the thin sample makes this a caution pick.

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrict AttendanceGrade UncertaintyNice but Risky
  • Single yet demands daily presence or makeups.
  • Student warns you can think you have an A and still fail if you do not check your grade.
  • Evidence is one old review and may even name a different instructor in the comment body.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Even if the content feels easier, the student says you can think you have an A and still fail without constant grade checks.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Difficulty is rated 2 and the and grade tracking more than concept hardness.

Difficulty evidence is only from the single in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Student states you must be there every day or make the day up.

Attendance detail is only from the in-person ENG101A comment.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

, but risk of failing despite feeling safe makes recommendation conditional.

Recommendation judgment .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Student warns you might fail even when you believe you have an A if you do not verify grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

; and grade monitoring.

Format shift

Workload is barely described beyond daily presence.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Described as very nice, but the overall experience includes serious grade and attendance stress.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Review mentions textbooks and grade anxiety but .

Format shift

Assessment structure is not detailed.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One in-person ENG101A review calls her nice but , and grade surprises that can lead to failure.

Main concern

You may believe you have an A yet still fail if and miss class.

What students said

“you have to be there every day or make that day up and ask questions even though you think you have an A in the class ask whats your grade because you might fail her class :(”
ENG101A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

review.

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , or proctoring.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“you have to be there every day or make that day up and ask questions even though you think you have an A in the class ask whats your grade because you might fail her class :(”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting attendance and grade risk. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️

15/100

“you have to be there every day or make that day up”

📉 Grade Risk

38/100

“even though you think you have an A in the class ask whats your grade because you might fail her class :(”

🙂 Personality

55/100

“Ms. Dias is a very nice teacher”

Theme 1

📅

  • you have to be there every day or make that day up
  • ask questions even though you think you have an A in the class

Theme 2

📊 About Grades

  • ask whats your grade because you might fail her class :(

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Single 2011 review with quality 3, no grade recorded, and a comment that names Ms. Dias, limiting reliability.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG101A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values