AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Debby Kilburn

CSCI100 · WEBPAGE · WEBDESIGN · P051 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a , but expect some real work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFun AssignmentsExtremely HelpfulAwesome CS TeacherMeaningful WorkMixed Ratings
  • Strong praise for meaningful fun assignments and constant help.
  • One older low quality rating pulls the average down slightly.
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Difficulty is moderate and praise focuses on helpfulness, not free grades.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Average difficulty around 2.5 with .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Students call her awesome and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

, but grades and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Meaningful fun assignments suggest real work without sounding overwhelming.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Students say she is awesome, extremely helpful, and designs fun meaningful work.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

The only detailed review highlights meaningful and fun assignments as the core.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person CS and web classes are mostly well liked, with one standout for .

Main concern

One lower rating and .

What students said

“Debby is awesome. She thinks of meaningful and fun assignments and .”
CSCI100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tools.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Debby is awesome. She thinks of meaningful and fun assignments and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, emphasizing the one detailed CS comment. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Debby is awesome. She thinks of meaningful and fun assignments and .”

🧩 Assignment Design

75/100

“She thinks of meaningful and fun assignments and .”

👍 Recommendation Tone

76/100

“Debby is awesome.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Debby is awesome.
  • She thinks of meaningful and fun assignments and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

40/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews from 2003-2009 with only one substantive comment and mixed quality scores.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CSCI1001 review
P0511 review
WEBDESIGN1 review
WEBPAGE1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values