AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Dominick Digiacomo

ENGC1000 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you write carefully and can handle heavy papers—experiences swing from life-changing learning to failing grades and unfair accusations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing English teacherTough graderLots of papersChatGPT accusationsClear feedback for some
  • Students either call him one of the sets them up to fail
  • , and last-minute criteria changes are major complaints
  • False ChatGPT accusations and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Grades range from A to D/D+ with and ChatGPT accusation failures.

Evidence comes only from four in-person Eng-C1000 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

, and confusing instructions make the course feel much harder than needed for some.

Evidence comes only from four in-person Eng-C1000 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

; one leaves it unspecified.

Evidence comes only from four in-person Eng-C1000 reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Half rate him 5 and ; half rate 1 with .

Evidence comes only from four in-person Eng-C1000 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

and accusations of AI use even when work is original.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of homework, so many papers, and and writing load.

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some find amazing lectures and caring fairness; and .

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Course centers on reading assignments, essays, and .

Format shift

In-person only evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person Eng-C1000 is sharply split between caring fair teaching with and .

Main concern

False AI-cheating accusations, last-minute criteria changes, and .

What students said

“Accuses you of using ChatGPT--even if you do not use ChatGPT.”
Eng-C1000
“ and fair and I truly learned a lot.”
Eng-C1000
“he changes criteria last minute without warning! Seems like he does not want you to succeed”
Eng-C1000

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do ; assessment is paper and reading focused.

Essay heavyMany papersReading assignments

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment centers on essays, readings, and papers; .

Essay heavyMany papersReading assignments
“So much reading and writing, and they don't even correlate.”
Eng-C1000
“There are and essays, but and fair and I truly learned a lot.”
Eng-C1000

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Accuses you of using ChatGPT--even if you do not use ChatGPT. My work was my own, and I should have done well, at least passed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting polarization in and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️ Polarized Teaching

48/100

“I think this teacher is very good if not the best.”

📝

30/100

“So much reading and writing, and they don't even correlate.”

⚠️

28/100

“Accuses you of using ChatGPT--even if you do not use ChatGPT.”

❤️ Positive Side

70/100

“An easy .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • So many papers
  • he changes criteria last minute without warning!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fairness

  • Accuses you of using ChatGPT--even if you do not use ChatGPT.
  • Seems like he does not want you to succeed
  • and fair and I truly learned a lot.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Four recent detailed in-person reviews show a .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

Eng-C10004 reviews

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values