AI Rate Professor

English

Matt Lemas

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and a structured weekly writing loop.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGives good feedbackClear essay coachingWeekly writing rhythmAccessible outside classParticipation matters
  • Strong constructive essay feedback that students say improved their writing.
  • create steady but manageable work.
  • students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is realistic, but and participation mean you still need steady work.

Evidence comes only from the single online review.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty sits mid-range with weekly readings, posts, and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

The .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Student rates him 5/5, would take again, and praises the teaching format as really helpful.

Recommendation rests on one enthusiastic online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

and grade reported is A, with .

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

keep a steady moderate pace.

Format shift

Workload detail is online-only.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

and a helpful post-then-essay weekly structure stand out.

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment centers on discussion posts and weekly essays rather than exams.

Format shift

Online-only evidence; no exams described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online summer English with and .

Main concern

Only one review, so broader patterns are unproven.

What students said

“He provided me improve my writing.”
13410

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essays and discussion posts; no proctored exams are described.

Essay-based assessmentWeekly discussion posts

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online work is weekly discussion posts and ; exams are not clearly described.

Weekly discussion postsWeekly essaysConstructive essay feedback
“We would have weekly discussion posts about the assigned readings, and then would apply what we learned to a ”
13410

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He provided me improve my writing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 online review, highlighting feedback and weekly writing structure. Credibility rating: Low.

✍️

90/100

“He provided me improve my writing.”

📅 Weekly Structure

85/100

“We would have weekly discussion posts about the assigned readings, and then would apply what we learned to a teaching really helpful)”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • format of
  • Accessible outside class

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • a
  • Participation matters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only one recent online review exists, so scores are informative but not highly reliable.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

134101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values