AI Rate Professor

English

Dolores Moreno

ENGLISH101 · ENGLI015 · ENG015 · ENGL015 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · ENGLI914 · ECON238 · ENG914 · 121 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative and can treat this as a near full-time writing bootcamp.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderOverwhelming homeworkDisorganized CanvasHarsh essay standardsHigh drop rates
  • and paper volume for English 101-level courses.
  • and little helpful feedback.
  • ; many dropped or warn others to run.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students report Cs, Ds, Fs, and and full effort; several say she almost never gives easy As.

Both online and ; online adds disorganization as another grade risk.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Workload and standards are described as advanced for English 101, with constant papers and dense requirements.

Online summer and full-term sections both report unrealistic assignment volume; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Many say skip and you will not pass; .

In-person attendance enforcement is harshest; as required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

14/100

and dominant run-away warnings outweigh a handful of older positive hardcore-learner reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

; tiny mistakes stack, rubrics are often missing, and Fs or Cs on essays are common.

Format shift

Both formats; in-person nursing majors and first-years .

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Multiple discussions, exercises, and and .

Format shift

Online week-two overload stories are frequent; .

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

, though a few older students praise rigor if they survive.

Format shift

; in-person critiques focus on dull lectures and inflexibility.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and writing-center requirements dominate grades more than a .

Format shift

Both formats; comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and grades stuck at C or lower for many despite heavy effort.

Main concern

and zero flexibility on absences crush many first-year students.

What students said

“We started with 30 people in the class and only four showed up for the final!”
ENG101
“ and she still failed me!”
ENG101
“She is the . !!!”
ENG914

Remote format

Online

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online ENG101 is widely described as disorganized, overloaded, and two.

Main concern

, and poor Canvas organization overwhelm most students.

What students said

“The amount of work was insane.”
ENG101
“There is .”
101
“ unless you want to fail”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Risk is less about proctoring tech and and little recovery.

Essay heavyNo rubrics oftenStrict standardsWriting center required

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person risk includes strict essays, tests for some levels, and .

Harsh essay gradingTest heavy in some sectionsMandatory attendance
“I would and I did everything possible to try and get .”
ENG101
“she failed me despite the fact that I showed her a doctors note.”
ENG914

Online

Online reviews emphasize unclear assignment directions, missing rubrics, and .

No rubricsUnclear instructionsEssay heavy
“There is .”
101
“Very undescriptive in the instructions of assignments”
ENG101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews with strong negative consensus online and in person. Credibility rating: High.

🏃

14/100

“Run and don't look back!”

📚 Workload Shock

10/100

“The amount of work was insane.”

⚖️

12/100

“ and she still failed me!”

🧩 Disorganization

20/100

“The info but and has many typos and missing modules.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Treats everyone like they are English majors
  • She grades hard
  • I guarantee she's probably never given one

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • Lots of
  • if you this is the only class for the semester

Theme 3

⚠️ About Clarity & Support

  • she will just redirect you to the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

121

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with highly consistent , and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 510
3 out of 519
2 out of 527
1 out of 550

Course coverage

ENG10121 reviews
ENG91412 reviews
1015 reviews
ENG0153 reviews
ENGL0152 reviews
Show 5 more courses
ENGLI9142 reviews
ENGLISH1012 reviews
ECON2381 review
ENGL1011 review
ENGLI0151 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

2

A- 2

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

11

C+ 1 · C 8 · C- 2

D range

5

D+ 2 · D 1 · D- 2

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

15

Drop/Withdrawal 11 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1