AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Justin Lim

CHEM104 · CHEM213 · CHEM101 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if and outside study; otherwise find another Chem professor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProStrong AccentSelf-Taught RequiredExtra CreditTest HeavyUnsupportive
  • Students frequently say lectures are due to a strong accent and thin in-class support.
  • and , but the class still feels test-heavy and self-taught.
  • Only a small share would take him again; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

and , but tests still require real outside studying to earn an A.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is introductory chemistry, but the pace and weak lectures make it feel harder than the material alone.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as mandatory across reviews and labs are treated as must-attend.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students call him unsupportive and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Clear criteria and help, but tests and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Labs, timed submissions, and , but comments do not describe an overwhelming load.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Students often say lectures are unhelpful, accent-heavy, and leave them teaching themselves.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tags and comments emphasize tests, pop quizzes, and limited reliance on other work.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person Chem sections feel laid-back at times but provide little real teaching support, so , and .

Main concern

Strong accent plus weak lecture support forces self-teaching and hurts struggling students.

What students said

“If you do not mind being 100% self-taught and .”
Chem-101
“ and do your own studying outside of class you'll be fine.”
Chem-101
“his lectures were just reading off PP provided by the text book.”
chem-213

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments lean on quizzes and open-book formats.

Pop QuizzesTest HeavyExtra Credit Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections flag pop quizzes and .

Pop QuizzesTest Heavy
“had about 2-3 pop quizzes that were too.”
Chem-101
“This professor was the .”
Chem-101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting self-teaching pressure, accent barriers, and low recommendation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“This professor was the .”

📚 Self-Teaching Load

28/100

“If you do not mind being 100% self-taught and .”

🎁 Buffer

55/100

“Clear grading, offers , had about 2-3 pop quizzes that were extra credit too.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lectures were just reading off PP provided by the text book.
  • and expects you to know everything
  • His accent is pretty strong so heads up

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and do your own studying outside of class you'll be fine.
  • as soon as possible

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support Gaps

  • gave no support to his students
  • He , so be careful.
  • find a good chem Youtuber & you'll be good!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

and accent theme, but the sample is small.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

Chem-1012 reviews
Chem-1042 reviews
chem-2131 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values