AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Cathrine Philips

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Possible solid chem option if you keep up with and math practice, but evidence is limited.

Best fit · Effort For RewardUnderstandingWeekly quizzesMath-heavy examsPop quizzesParticipation matters
  • Only two reviews exist, so the picture is thin and mixed.
  • She is described as lenient and .
  • Chemistry math and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

One student finished with 89% and called her lenient, but the and .

All evidence is from two in-person Chem 101 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is approachable with .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as mandatory.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

; the other left recommendation blank after a tougher experience.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

She is called very lenient and and an .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Weekly quizzes, assignments, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

65/100

Students value her understanding style, but one still found the class difficult overall.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

66/100

Weekly quizzes, labs, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Two in-person Chem 101 reviews call her understanding, with weekly quizzes and .

Main concern

and sparse sample size.

What students said

“finished class with a 89% , there were quizzes every week , but and understanding”
101-4
“It was a difficult class but if and .”
101-4

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Weekly quizzes and , while one student found the .

Weekly quizzesEasy finals reported onceMath-heavy examsPop quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and math-focused exams, with one report of an .

Weekly quizzesMath-heavy examsEasy finals (one report)Pop quizzes
“ , but ”
101-4
“The .”
101-4

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“finished class with a 89% , there were quizzes every week , but and understanding”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person Chem reviews, highlighting leniency and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

65/100

“ .”

⚖️

74/100

“she's very lenient and understanding”

🧮

40/100

“The .”

👍

55/100

“if and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she's very lenient and understanding
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I struggled mainly with the math.
  • The .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews over two years give limited, partly mixed detail, so confidence stays low.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

101-42 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values