AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Brianna Herndon

ANTHRO106 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Promising if you use office help and , but treat the tough-exam report seriously until more reviews appear.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring MentorExtra CreditTough Grader RiskAccessible Outside ClassAnti-AI Exam Style
  • Only two recent ANTHRO106 reviews paint opposite pictures of difficulty and support.
  • One student got an A with and lots of in an accelerated hybrid-style term.
  • The other found exams confusing and .
  • suitableStudentType

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic with clear instructions and , but the other review shows tough grading and .

All evidence is from in-person ANTHRO106 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

One student found an accelerated term manageable with support; the and .

Course challenge .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

as mandatory and the other as not mandatory, so .

reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

60/100

One enthusiastic yes for her care and , and one neutral-to-negative hard-exam experience leave the .

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and clear pass guidance help some students, but tough-grader and .

Format shift

Mixed grading views are both from in-person ANTHRO106.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Lots-of-homework and accelerated work with .

Format shift

Workload detail .

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Students note , and accessibility, tempered by one report of .

Format shift

Teaching quality comments are only in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Reviews emphasize exams and anti-AI exam design called out.

Format shift

Assessment comments are from in-person sections only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Both reviews are for ANTHRO106 in person (one accelerated/hybrid-style term); one praises dedication and , the and grading tough.

Main concern

Conflicting reports on exam clarity and .

What students said

“she was very dedicated to helping us succeed, especially since it was an accelerated course.”
ANTHRO106
“Because she wants to prevent AI usage, her exams are confusingggg with random questions.”
ANTHRO106

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear central and , while can cushion overall grades.

Anti-AI Exam DesignConfusing QuestionsTest HeavyExtra Credit Available

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are described as load.

Anti-AI Exam DesignConfusing QuestionsTest Heavy
“Because she wants to prevent AI usage, her exams are confusingggg with random questions. She is a .”
ANTHRO106

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she was very dedicated to helping us succeed, especially since it was an accelerated course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews only, highlighting care, , and . Credibility rating: Low.

❤️ Caring Support

68/100

“she was very dedicated to helping us succeed, especially since it was an accelerated course.”

📝 Helps

70/100

“She also offered lots of opportunities!”

🧪

40/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Support & Style

  • Caring
  • Accessible outside class

Theme 2

📈

  • She is a .
  • Lots of homework
  • Test heavy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two recent reviews for one course, with opposite tones, so confidence in any single score remains low.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTHRO1062 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values