AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Anita Arnold

NURS161 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a demanding nursing instructor who will push you and still actively help you improve.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerAmazing lecturesPassionate mentorClear grading criteriaPushes studentsNot a pushover
  • Both reviews rate her 5/5 for , and advocacy.
  • Course difficulty is real; she pushes hard and is fair but firm.
  • Sample size is only two reviews, so confidence is limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Difficulty is rated high and one reported grade is B+, with emphasis on being pushed rather than free grades.

All evidence is from two in-person NURS161 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Students say the material is difficult even while lectures make learning engaging.

All evidence is from two in-person NURS161 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

; the other does not specify, so as required.

All evidence is from two in-person NURS161 reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

and praise her as a strong advocate and instructor.

All evidence is from two in-person NURS161 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Described as fair with , but explicitly not a pushover.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Comments focus on difficulty and participation more than assignment volume.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

, and active support for improvement.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews stress participation and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person NURS161 students call her passionate, approachable, and knowledgeable, with high expectations and fair standards.

Main concern

Hard material and high push; not an easy ride.

What students said

“Professor Arnold is very passionate about helping !”
NURS161
“Pushes you but you will thank her for it. She is fair but absolutely not a push over.”
NURS161

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews and fair standards.

Clear grading criteria

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly describe proctoring or open-book policy; and fair.

Clear grading criteriaFair standards
“She is fair but absolutely not a push over.”
NURS161

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Pushes you but you will thank her for it. She is fair but absolutely not a push over.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person NURS161 reviews, highlighting passion, rigor, and advocacy. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“makes learning fun even if the material is difficult!”

💪 High Standards

55/100

“She is fair but absolutely not a push over.”

❤️ Student Advocacy

88/100

“She is a great advocate and resource that helps figure out the areas of improvement needed”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing lectures
  • Approachable manner and makes learning fun
  • Great instructor that is full of knowledge.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Pushes you but you will thank her for it
  • material is difficult

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • very passionate about helping her students
  • extremely knowledgeable and always ready to help
  • great advocate and resource

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two glowing reviews exist, so quality signals are strong but sample size and detail breadth remain weak.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NURS1612 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values