AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Ana Mayo

CHEM150 · CHEM101 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you attend, grind Pearson practice, and use office hours or STEM tutoring.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra credit availableClear lecturesLots of Pearson homeworkStudy guides for examsCaring but test-focused
  • Most students succeed in gen chem with , and
  • and Pearson assignments
  • One strong negative online review cites favoritism and mismatched study guides

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many As come with , and study guides, but and hard work are still required.

; the single online review is more hostile and grade-unclear.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Gen chem content is manageable with practice, but , and .

; online review reports higher friction.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and warn that skipping hurts notes, makeups, and grades.

Both online and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

About 80% would take again; , while one online student strongly advises against her.

In-person recommendation is strong; online evidence is a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

, and study guides help grades for students who put in work.

Format shift

+; online review does not report a grade.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and several exams keep the load heavy if you fall behind.

Format shift

; online review focuses more on exams.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Clear lectures and complaint.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is strong; online experience is sharply negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

and quizzes matter, but 3-4 exams are central and often multiple choice.

Format shift

; online review is test-heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students , and fair-to-manageable grading with hard work.

Main concern

, and exams that reward steady studying.

What students said

“I never thought I would get an A in gen chem but look at moi! I genuinely understood the concepts too.”
CHEM150
“Gives out study guides which is a . Effort is required on your part”
CHEM101
“Multiple chances to get 100% on online HW and quizzes.”
CHEM101

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online review is strongly negative, citing favoritism, belittling, and study guides that .

Main concern

Perceived favoritism and .

What students said

“Her study guide for the .”
CHEM150
“will belittle you while she talks to you. .”
CHEM150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and mixed policies on cheat sheets; not clearly open-book or proctored online.

Multiple choice examsStudy guidesCheat sheet sometimes allowedNo cheat sheets reported by somePartial credit

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

guides; some allow a one-page cheat sheet, others say none, and partial credit can help.

4 multiple choice examsStudy guides1 page cheat sheet allowed (some terms)No cheat sheets (other terms)Partial points on exams
“4 multiple choice exams, 1 page cheat sheet allowed, accurate study guides”
CHEM101
“no there are no cheat sheets in her class”
CHEM101
“ ”
CHEM150

Online

One online review says exams do not match the study guide and .

Test heavyStudy guide mismatch
“Her study guide for the .”
CHEM150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“1000/10% amazing professor! I never thought I would get an A in gen chem but look at moi! I genuinely understood the concepts too.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews (9 in-person, 1 , and format split. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ and very informative.”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“4 exams, lots of 100 on hw.”

⚠️ Online Warning

20/100

“From my experience with this professor she will show favoritism.”

👍 Recommendation

80/100

“Amazing chem professor, she wants every student to strive for success and does everything to make sure students are prepared for exams.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and very informative
  • If you're willing to learn she is willing to teach you
  • Funny jokes in lectures!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Multiple chances to get 100% on online HW and quizzes
  • Gives out study guides which is a
  • overall she is great and have to work hard for a grade

Theme 3

⚠️ Mixed Experiences

  • She offers a lot of opportunities and is a

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across 2018-2026 with and ; mostly consistent in-person praise plus one dissenting online review.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM1016 reviews
CHEM1504 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 3 · A 4

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values