AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Mirette Morcos

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Avoid unless you are highly self-directed and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProGet ready to readLimited feedbackTough graderUnclear reading guidancePolarizing
  • one lukewarm online A and one harsh in-person rejection
  • Students must self-direct textbook reading with little guidance or
  • Not a safe pick without more recent positive evidence

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

One student got an A by self-reading, while another earned a D+ and tagged her as a .

Online report is more grade-friendly; in-person report is much harsher.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty ratings are moderate, but poor guidance makes the experience harder than the raw content alone.

Online difficulty rated lower; in-person rated higher.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and one tags participation as important.

and in-person reports.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

One student would take again despite issues; the .

Online lean is cautious yes; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and a D+ outcome outweigh a single self-directed A.

Format shift

Online A and D+.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Main work appears textbook , but guidance is weak.

Format shift

Both formats stress reading; online notes short lectures.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Nice demeanor and short lectures do not , and one very negative review.

Format shift

Online is lukewarm; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Textbook is mainly mentioned for the midterm, suggesting exams drive .

Format shift

; in-person lacks assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and a D+ outcome.

Main concern

Harsh overall experience and .

What students said

“UGH NO EWW”
100-60

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online student found her nice with short lectures and still earned an A, but and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ .”
100-60
“she never posted what chapters to read or that we needed to read the textbook.”
100-60

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove proctoring style; the the midterm.

Midterm relies on textbookSelf-directed reading

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person .

Tough grader
“UGH NO EWW”
100-60

Online

Online review only clearly supports that the textbook becomes important for the midterm; .

Textbook needed for midtermNo posted chapter schedule
“The only time she mentioned the textbook was for the midterm.”
100-60

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If textbook, she won't tell you when.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in-person), highlighting weak guidance and polarized grades. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“This professor was very nice; her lectures lasted maybe 30 minutes. However, .”

📖 Self-Directed Reading

35/100

“she never posted what chapters to read or that we needed to read the textbook.”

👎 Harsh Pushback

10/100

“UGH NO EWW”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her lectures lasted maybe 30 minutes
  • she never posted what chapters to read

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • be sure to read the textbook, she won't tell you when
  • UGH NO EWW

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews with conflicting tone and limited detail, so conclusions remain unstable.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

100-602 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values