AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Evan Craft

CHEM105 · CHEM212 · CHEM101 · CHEM104 · CHEM150 · PS101 · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
65.85%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you study the practice material hard and ; skip if you need a soft, hand-holding chem teacher.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture heavyClear expectationsPractice exams matchExtra creditPolarizing style
  • Many students succeed with , and dropped lowest scores.
  • Chemistry is still hard and and proctored quizzes.
  • some call him funny and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A , and , but chem content and tests still demand real study time.

Both formats require solid study; online does not make the A easier.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Students repeatedly call chemistry hard and lecture heavy even when they like him.

In person and online both describe substantial lecture and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

while , and exams remain required.

Several in-person and online reviews still list attendance mandatory for .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

; fans praise clarity and fairness, critics cite personality and stress.

and online negatives.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, and balance a sometimes strict lab and exam standard.

Format shift

Online and in ; some still call him a .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Weekly homework, long lectures, labs, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Both formats are lecture and test heavy.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Strong when students use practice material and ask for help; .

Format shift

In person positives dominate the sample; online is more mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and , though practice work strongly predicts tests.

Format shift

Consistent across formats with test-heavy structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person he is often praised for , and fair tools to pass, but a sizable minority report rudeness and .

Main concern

Blunt tone and lecture-heavy chem load can overwhelm some students.

What students said

“ as practice ones.”
CHEM105
“He is the if .”
CHEM101

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some say practice exams closely match tests, others say lectures were late and questions felt dismissed.

Main concern

Inconsistent support online and high-stakes testing.

What students said

“His practice exams were 90% what was going to be on the .”
CHEM105
“Please do yourself a favor and scared, he doesn't like answering questions”
CHEM150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are manageable if you study practice sets, but and memorization is often required.

Practice exams match real testsProctored quizzesNo formula cheat sheet sometimesDropped lowest exam

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In and homework, and some terms ban formula sheets.

Proctored quizzesPractice similar to examsMemorization requiredExtra credit available
“ .”
CHEM105
“You can't use a formula cheat sheet, you must memorize everything.”
CHEM104
“ as practice ones.”
CHEM105

Online

Online students emphasize that and that lectures must be watched carefully.

Practice exams match testsLecture dependentTest heavy
“His practice exams were 90% what was going to be on the .”
CHEM105
“he gives you a review in the exams but doesn't come out almost none of that.”
CHEM150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Exams were very similar almost exact same as practice ones. and and goes over.”

Voice snapshots generated from 41 reviews, highlighting practice exams, heavy chem load, and polarizing tone. Credibility rating: High.

📚

75/100

“His practice exams were 90% what was going to be on the .”

⚖️ Polarizing Personality

45/100

“for a mistake created on my own and I acknowledge that, way”

🎯

70/100

“As long as you go to every lecture and this class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Incredibly straight-forward in his teaching.
  • Very relateable and funny.
  • and not all the extra.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • .
  • its a chemistry course; not meant to be easy.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • he is much friendlier and is seriously a good guy.
  • he made me feel like and idiot who was wasting his time.
  • and genuinely cares about his students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

41

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-one reviews over many years provide rich detail; opinions polarize but , and teaching style are stable.

Inside 41 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 59

Course coverage

CHEM10118 reviews
CHEM1047 reviews
CHEM1507 reviews
CHEM1056 reviews
CHEM2122 reviews
Show 1 more courses
PS1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 3 · A 9

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 4