AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Tanisha Flowers

PSY100 · PSY1 · PSYCH100 · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
39.29%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

; older easy in-person praise no longer matches recent experience.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRecent online backlashTough meticulous graderLittle useful feedbackOlder easy-A reputationFormat quality collapse
  • , and an easy A with few tests.
  • Recent online reviews , and professionalism.
  • because current students feel ignored and graded harshly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Older sections felt like an easy A, but recent students , and failed or dropped outcomes.

; recent online reviews say harsh grading despite effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Content itself is intro psych, but timed tests, dense discussions, and .

Older in person felt light; online now feels tedious and test-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Online often lists attendance as not mandatory, while .

Online is more flexible on attendance; in .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Recent students strongly warn others away despite a cluster of older glowing reviews.

In-person older reviews recommend her highly; recent online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tough grader is the dominant recent tag, with low averages and .

Format shift

Older in person felt generous; recent online is described as meticulous and unforgiving.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

and few tests; recent online adds discussions, papers, quizzes, and picky submissions.

Format shift

Online recent workload feels heavier and .

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Past students loved her humor and stories, but current reviews say she does not teach, ignores questions, and lacks professionalism.

Format shift

In-person legacy reviews are excellent; recent online experience is widely called awful.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of quizzes, midterms, discussions, and a .

Format shift

Older in person was mostly two tests; online now stresses quizzes, discussions, and major assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Older in-person classes were seen as , and easy to pass if you attended.

Main concern

Recent in-person comments also accuse her of ego and poor help, so past ease may not hold.

What students said

“Tanisha Flowers is the !! she connects with her students and is really easy to pass”
PSYCH100
“Easy A, gives study guides, very little work.”
PSYCH100
“ . Ms. Flowers is an ego-filled teacher.”
PSYCH100

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Recent online PSYCH100 is widely described as , and poorly supported.

Main concern

and weak communication.

What students said

“100% DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS. Even if it's .”
PSYCH100
“She doesn't teach and talks about everything else but class material. !”
PSYCH100
“Not actually hard, she just grades horribly.”
PSYCH100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Recent students report a and covered material; older terms used easier quizzes and study guides.

Timed midterm pressureQuiz-heavy termsTest heavy tagsCrash Course based quizzes in older terms

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final or easy quizzes with study guides.

Few testsStudy guidesPowerPoint-based exams
“There are only 2 tests but if you pay attention you will do just fine.”
PSYCH100
“ and .”
PSYCH100

Online

Online comments describe late-released short quizzes and a .

Timed midtermShort quiz windowsQuiz from videos
“It was 45 minutes for 70 questions, had material we did not cover yet”
PSYCH100
“had a was released late)”
PSYCH100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“100% DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS. Even if it's .”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 reviews, weighting the recent online . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“She doesn't teach and talks about everything else but class material.”

⚖️

22/100

“Not actually hard, she just grades horribly.”

📉 Recommendation

32/100

“ . Ms. Flowers is an ego-filled teacher.”

🕰️ Older Easy-A Era

85/100

“Easy A class though and you have to go to class every session or .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • podcast which is 90% her just talking about herself and her nail tech
  • Loved her vibe! Made the class relatable
  • She tells great stories during lecture that help you understand the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She's a and is very tedious on how to submit things
  • Class average was under 5/20 for every assignment
  • you just have to follow basic instructions.

Theme 3

💬

  • If you have questions or . .
  • grades extremely meticulous but doesn't have a rubric and refuses to give any comments
  • if you ask!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

28 reviews with a and highly consistent recent online complaints support a strong credibility call.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 513

Course coverage

PSYCH10022 reviews
PSY1004 reviews
PSY12 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 4 · A 6

B range

10

B+ 3 · B 7

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2