AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Sydnee Woodland

ACC200 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you will attend, ask questions, and put in weekly work; be cautious with her online section.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPatient and caringExtra credit richLate work acceptedParticipation heavyBest for accounting help
  • In-person ACC-200 students repeatedly call her the , and after-class help.
  • , and exams, but and late-work flexibility soften the load.
  • One online review is negative after a , so online format is riskier.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

As and Bs are common with and late work, but accounting still requires steady weekly effort rather than free As.

support; the online review ended in .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Accounting content is repeatedly called difficult, though lectures and help sessions make it manageable.

Online called not for the weak; in-person students also say accounting is hard but doable with questions.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and participation is a major grade driver.

; in-person reviews consistently mark attendance mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students strongly recommend her for patience and support, tempered .

In-person recommendations are glowing; the single online review is a cautionary outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

, last-day late work, clear criteria, and .

Format shift

In-person students detail and late work; online review did not experience that flexibility.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and multiple exams create a heavy but structured load.

Format shift

Online tags so many papers and test heavy; and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students highlight patient explanations, prompt emails, after-class help, and genuine investment in success.

Format shift

In-person teaching is excellent; the .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of weekly homework, reading quizzes, participation, and focus.

Format shift

In-person details 3 exams plus weekly quizzes; online felt lecture and test heavy with many papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise a safe, patient, helpful environment with , and strong success support.

Main concern

and participation can feel heavy.

What students said

“If you need accounting she's the .”
ACC-200
“she allows up to the last day of the semester to turn in any assignments.”
ACC-200

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online ACC-200 felt work-heavy and high-risk after a while the student was still trying to complete work.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Professor dropped me with . And there was only three to four weeks left of the semester.”
ACC-200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard quiz-and-exam structure with weekly true/false quizzes and .

Weekly quizzesThree examsTrue/false quizzesParticipation graded

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, mandatory participation, and flexible late homework.

Weekly true/false quizzesThree examsLate work acceptedExtra credit
“ but they are true false questions.”
ACC-200
“Homework and a reading quiz every week with 3 exams throughout the semester.”
ACC-200

Online

and papers but does not describe proctoring tools or .

Test heavyMany papers
“This professor had lots of work. Taking this class online is not for the weak.”
ACC-200

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews (1 online, 6 in person), highlighting care, heavy-but-supported workload, and online risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“She was willing to stay after class and help me with homework and made sure that I had a .”

📦 Workload Reality

32/100

“Homework and a reading quiz every week with 3 exams throughout the semester.”

❤️ Student Support

90/100

“Professor Woodland wants all her students to achieve their highest potential. She is giving of her time and she is so patient and kind.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she takes time and understanding with students
  • professor created a safe environment in class lectures
  • She always answered my emails promptly

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Accounting is not an easy subject to learn but show up to every class and ask questions
  • she allows up to the last day of the semester to turn in any assignments
  • she offers multiple opportunities

Theme 3

⚠️ About Online Risk

  • Taking this class online is not for the weak
  • Professor dropped me with

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed reviews from 2023-2025 show strong consistency on care and workload, with .

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACC-2007 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1