AI Rate Professor

English

Jeannette Riddell

ENG10152 · ENGLISH101 · EN101 · ENGL101 · ENG101 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

Avoid unless and can handle blunt, tough feedback.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderSo many papersRude demeanorLots of homeworkMany drops
  • Most students describe rude or condescending treatment and .
  • , and harsh grading.
  • A small minority likes her spunky style and earns As with full effort and attendance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

A few students earn As , but many , and zero-tolerance mistakes.

Online has more D and ; in-person has both As and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Content is writing-heavy rather than conceptual, but volume of papers and strict standards make it hard.

Both formats stress many papers; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Skip class and you will not pass appears often, and emergencies are poorly accommodated.

In-person is clearly mandatory; but still often strict.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

About one quarter would take again against a flood of and .

A ; recent online and in-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

; one wrong step can mean zero and .

Format shift

Online stresses zero-for-one-mistake grading; .

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

, and workshops create constant heavy work.

Format shift

Both formats report so many papers; in-person adds heavy printing requirements.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Most students say she does not teach helpfully and treats questions with attitude, though a few find her interesting and spunky.

Format shift

Negativity is strong online and in person; the rare glowing reviews are mostly older in-person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment is essay and exams.

Format shift

Online and ; one positive notes a 10-page research paper.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person sections demand heavy printing, peer workshops, and and frequent drops.

Main concern

and inflexible emergency policies.

What students said

“ , and just writes whatever with .”
ENGLISH101
“I even brought a drs note and she rejected it telling me she didn't care!”
EN101
“She is an amazing woman. I personally loved her class”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online sections draw sharp complaints about rudeness, zero-for-one-mistake grading, vague modules, and .

Main concern

and little real help online.

What students said

“She is rude, condescending and makes backhanded.”
ENG101
“The instructor in this class is demeaning and rude to most of her students.”
ENGL101
“Lots of essays but .”
ENG101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course risk comes from strict multi-draft essays and a .

So many papersResearch paper requiredPeer workshopsTough paper grading

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work requires multi-copy drafts, scholarly sources, workshops, and a research paper to pass.

3 essays plus research paperMust complete research paper to passPrint multiple copiesPeer workshops
“YOU MUST COMPLETE THE .”
ENGL101
“You are forced to use scholarly articles/books and print out at least 15-16 pages of your source”
ENG101

Online

Online reviews focus on harsh paper grading and .

So many papersTough graderVague modules
“Lots of essays but .”
ENG101
“ . She doesnt help when asked”
EN101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews (10 online, 10 in person), highlighting rudeness and . Credibility rating: High.

😡 Rude Treatment

15/100

“She is rude, condescending and makes backhanded.”

📄 Paper Overload

16/100

“A paper with 5 copies is due weekly that includes sources even if it is 20 pages long.”

⚖️

18/100

“do 1 thing wrong and it's a zero”

👍 Minority Praise

70/100

“SHE IS AWESOME. ODD A TIMES BUT SHE IS REALLY INTO HER SUBJECT”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she doesn't teach at all and expects you to know what she's talking about.
  • When you ask her a question she just tells you to look at the modules posted without helping.
  • She's very different but that so interesting...

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She grades too hard. She expects her students to be perfect at writing.
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK
  • Most of the students dropped the class (a little over 20).

Theme 3

💔 About Character

  • THE WORST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • She made me suffer from panic attacks so I was unable to finish the class.
  • shes super spunky and has a great personality.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty detailed reviews from 2017 to 2025 across online and a clear minority of fans.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ENG10112 reviews
ENGL1013 reviews
EN1012 reviews
ENGLISH1012 reviews
ENG101521 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

5

C+ 2 · C 1 · C- 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 6 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1